On Sat, 14 Oct 2017, William Casarin <j...@jb55.com> wrote: > Hey Jani, > > Patches look good so far, concept ack for sure. > > > Jani Nikula <j...@nikula.org> writes: > >> For example, you can use --no-exclude instead of --exclude=false in >> notmuch show. If we had keyword flag arguments with some flags >> defaulting to on, say --include=tags in notmuch dump/restore, this >> would allow --no-include=tags to switch that off while not affecting >> other flags. > > I've been testing it a bit, I can't seem to make this work in this example: > > ./notmuch count --no-exclude > > After some brief investigation it might be because count is using > EXCLUDE_true(1) and EXCLUDE_false(0) which are not equal to > NOTMUCH_EXCLUDE_TRUE(1) and NOTMUCH_EXCLUDE_FALSE(2), but I'm not sure.
*blush* I screwed those enums up. Here's a patch that takes care of both issues id:20171014201836.4486-1-j...@nikula.org. It's independent of this series. BR, Jani. _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
