Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net> writes: > > So we have bumped from 1 to 2 with just a simple addition in the past. > But maybe that was from before we knew better? >
probably. > At any rate, since the only thing that we're doing is emitting > message.crypto, i think we can avoid bumping the version in this series. > agreed. > That said, i think i need to wrap the block with a test for > (notmuch_format_version >= 4) in this case, right? yeah, I think so, since otherwise there's no real specification for the schmema of e.g. version 2 + random stuff. > > My new series will try out something like this, let me know what you > think! > I approve this message. d _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch