On Thu 2019-05-30 02:18:57 +0000, Rollins, Jameson wrote: > I understand that this fix is for multipart/encrypted messages, but I'm > not sure I would call the repair function itself a "crypto function". > Given that I can imagine more repair functions in the future, would it > make sense to break them out into their own library?
I agree that this technically isn't a "crypto function", and as such
might not belong where i've put it. What would you think about
util/repair.{c,h} or util/demangling.{c,h} ?
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
