On Sat, Sep 14 2019, David Bremner <da...@tethera.net> wrote: > Jameson Graef Rollins <jroll...@caltech.edu> writes: > >> Can we have notmuch auto-apply a tag, like the "encrypted" and "signed" >> tags, that indicates mail has been mangled in this way? I'm feeling >> somewhat morally opposed to just silently fixing mail that's been broken >> by bad/irresponsible actors on the net. We need to keep pushing on MS >> to fix this issue globally, so I for one would like to be reminded if >> I'm still being affected by this. > > It's side point, but it should rather be a property than a tag if we do > something like that. In hindsight I think "auto tags" were probably a > design mistake, since they are (easily) mutable by users.
Right, sorry, yes it should be a property. I agree. Any reason not to move "encrypted" and "signed" to be properties as well? jamie. _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
