On Sun, Nov 03 2019, David Bremner wrote:
> Put the build product (and tests) in a well known location so that we
> can find them e.g. from the tests.
> ---
> Makefile.local | 2 +-
> bindings/Makefile.local | 9 +++++++++
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile.local b/Makefile.local
> index 3c6dacbc..7c12612d 100644
> --- a/Makefile.local
> +++ b/Makefile.local
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> # -*- makefile -*-
>
> .PHONY: all
> -all: notmuch notmuch-shared build-man build-info ruby-bindings
> +all: notmuch notmuch-shared build-man build-info ruby-bindings
> python-cffi-bindings
> ifeq ($(MAKECMDGOALS),)
> ifeq ($(shell cat .first-build-message 2>/dev/null),)
> @NOTMUCH_FIRST_BUILD=1 $(MAKE) --no-print-directory all
> diff --git a/bindings/Makefile.local b/bindings/Makefile.local
> index 18f95835..b8e18c92 100644
> --- a/bindings/Makefile.local
> +++ b/bindings/Makefile.local
> @@ -13,6 +13,13 @@ ifeq ($(HAVE_RUBY_DEV),1)
> $(MAKE) -C $(dir)/ruby
> endif
>
> +python-cffi-bindings: lib/$(LINKER_NAME)
> +ifeq ($(HAVE_PYTHON_CFFI),1)
> + cd $(dir)/python-cffi && \
how bad does out-of-tree build break with this -- do we need to do
the same as with ruby bindings (copy sources -- do we still do so)? or does
python provide better alternative..?
> + ${PYTHON} setup.py build --build-lib build/stage && \
> + mkdir -p build/stage/tests && cp tests/*.py build/stage/tests
> +endif
> +
> CLEAN += $(patsubst %,$(dir)/ruby/%, \
> .RUBYARCHDIR.time \
> Makefile database.o directory.o filenames.o\
> @@ -20,3 +27,5 @@ CLEAN += $(patsubst %,$(dir)/ruby/%, \
> status.o tags.o thread.o threads.o)
>
> CLEAN += bindings/ruby/.vendorarchdir.time
> +
> +CLEAN += bindings/python-cffi/build
> --
> 2.24.0.rc1
>
> _______________________________________________
> notmuch mailing list
> notmuch@notmuchmail.org
> https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
_______________________________________________
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
