David Bremner <da...@tethera.net> writes: > Tomi Ollila <tomi.oll...@iki.fi> writes: > >> >> Anyway, the log.gz did not show any tests failing but parallel exiting >> nonzero possibly for some other reason. Cannot say. Probably stracing (even >> with --seccomp-bpf) would make it happen even less likely :/ >> > > Thanks to both of you for your feedback / suggestions. I did read today > that timeout exits with 124 when the time limit is reached. I haven't > investigated further (nor do I know how the timelimit should be reached, > since the whold build+test cycle takes about 10s on this machine.
Maybe a timeout is not so crazy. I ran a couple of trials with NOTMUCH_TEST_TIMEOUT=0, and it eventually hung (after 6, and 110 repetitions) in T355-smime, as far as I can tell on the first test. I'm currently running some trials to see if I can duplicate that without parallel execution, but that of course takes longer. d _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org
