on second thought, i think we could perhaps just go for the simpler "%t", which would allow inserting the type anywhere, even in the middle of a word... i think a problem here is that "word" or "symbol" (which is what my suggestion used) constituent depend on the definition of what's a word or symbol in the active mode.
although that would prevent fancy things like "%type: %t", but that's a bit of a corner case, don't you think? cheers, jao -- The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently. -Friedrich Nietzsche, philosopher (1844-1900) _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org