Tomi Ollila <tomi.oll...@iki.fi> writes: > On Sat, Feb 12 2022, Michael J. Gruber wrote: > > Only thing that came into mind are directory timestamps... if directory > (m)time is same as before notmuch will not scan it for files... > > ... following that if the granularity of directory timestamp were 1 second, > then it could easily happen than first one new message is not seen, and > next time there is one extra message to be see...
What do you think about adding --full-scan to the notmuch-new invocation in add_message? It doesn't make any tests fail and is about the same speed. I need to do a few more trials, but first time through it was actually faster (!), maybe because the cache is hot _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org
