Am Mo., 13. Juni 2022 um 11:31 Uhr schrieb erik colson <e...@ecocode.net>: > > Michael J Gruber <michaeljgruber+grubix+...@gmail.com> writes: > > > That search works without the macro, but not as a macro: notmuch > > computes an empty `Query()` for this (as per `NOTMUCH_DEBUG_QUERY=1`). > > I'm not sure whether this is intended or an artefact of the > > implementation, since both the macro and the regex need > > expansion/evaluation before being fed to xapian, and the order > > matters. > > > > Defining `D=(macro (dossier) ((tag ,dossier)))` and calling it with > > `(D (rx ddddd))` works, btw (but is not what you want, obviously), so > > something tells me lazy evaluation of macros is not completely lazy ;) > > Thanks for checking this out Michael. I decided to write an emacs lisp > function which I keybind and which prompts for the variable, and then > launches notmuch-search with that: > > (defun ec/notmuch-search-dossier () > "Zoek mails van een dossier" > (interactive > (let* ((dossier (read-no-blanks-input "Dossier:")) > (zoek (concat "tag:/" dossier "/"))) > (notmuch-search zoek nil nil nil nil)))) > > This works like a charm ;) Well, I am of course open to enhancement > suggestions! > > Also I upgraded my OS to fedora36 and now I use the standard notmuch > package instead of compiling it myself. So I don't have sexp support > anymore and therefor I am moving the squeries I added to my notmuch > config into emacs lisp functions.
FYI: I submitted sfsexp to fedora (review pending), and as soon as that is in, I will adjust the notmuch package. (Until then there is copr mjg/notmuch-sfsexp at your own risk ;)) Cheers Michael _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org
