Am Do., 22. Sept. 2022 um 10:47 Uhr schrieb Justus Winter <jus...@sequoia-pgp.org>: > > This replaces the old OpenPGPv4 key that is used in the test suite > with a more modern OpenPGPv4 key. All cryptographic artifacts in the
Both v4? Only one key file is named v4. > @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Message-ID: <simple-signed-m...@crypto.notmuchmail.org> > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; > protocol="application/pgp-signature"; > - micalg=pgp-sha512 > + micalg=pgp-sha256 You are downgrading the hash algo here and in the other regenerated signatures. This is not wrong per-se, I'm just wondering whether it is intentional (or forced by the standard) when the aim of this series is future-proofing. sha256 is the current "replacement" for sha1, which means it's the one which will be replaced next ;) Michael _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org
