On 09/23/2014 08:24 AM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 23-09-14 om 07:35 schreef Ben Skeggs:
>>> On 09/22/2014 03:08 AM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>>>> This fixes a regression introduced by "drm/nouveau: rework to new fence 
>>>> interface"
>>>> (commit 29ba89b2371d466).
>>
>> I'm still seeing issues with suspend, even with this patch, and the
>> one you pastebinned recently.
>>
> Annoying, and I'm out of ideas. The pastebinned patch is posted to dri-devel 
> as:
> [PATCH 2/8] drm/nouveau: specify if interruptible wait is desired in 
> nouveau_fence_sync.
> 
> Could you bisect to where the suspend issues started? With this patch applied 
> after
> "drm/nouveau: rework to new fence interface", and the other patch applied 
> after
> "drm/nouveau: use shared fences for readable objects"

I started bisecting to track down the suspend issue, but X won't start
at all with today's dri-next tree @ d743ecf36063 ("drm/doc: Fixup
drm_irq kerneldoc includes") plus the two patches, so I'll have to get
that out of the way first.
_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau

Reply via email to