Er hm, I guess if it never had external users, it's OK. And so then old userspace should still work with new libdrm?
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 11:19 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imir...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > You remove public functions... is this enough for a so version bump? > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Ben Skeggs <skeg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> From: Ben Skeggs <bske...@redhat.com> >> >> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bske...@redhat.com> >> --- >> configure.ac | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac >> index b929d36..7678572 100644 >> --- a/configure.ac >> +++ b/configure.ac >> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ >> >> AC_PREREQ([2.63]) >> AC_INIT([libdrm], >> - [2.4.65], >> + [2.4.66], >> [https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=DRI], >> [libdrm]) >> >> -- >> 2.6.3 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nouveau mailing list >> Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau _______________________________________________ Nouveau mailing list Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau