Indeed, it looks like the devel-clk branch does not have that typo.
On 2017-12-29 — 13:39, Rosen Penev wrote: > This is fixed in a different nouveau branch. from Ben Skeggs last I remember. > > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 1:37 PM, Pierre Moreau <pierre.mor...@free.fr> wrote: > > The typo is still present in master. > > Not sure whether it will help you Ben, regarding Fermi reclocking, but it > > shouldn’t harm in reducing possible errors. :-) > > > > Regards, > > Pierre > > > > On 2017-07-27 — 18:20, Rosen Penev wrote: > >> Signed-off by: Rosen Penev <ros...@gmail.com> > >> --- > >> drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c > >> b/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c > >> index 4a9bd4f1..feb8820c 100644 > >> --- a/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c > >> +++ b/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c > >> @@ -717,7 +717,7 @@ gf100_ram_new_(const struct nvkm_ram_func *func, > >> ram->fuc.r_0x10f9b4 = ramfuc_reg(0x10f9b4); > >> ram->fuc.r_0x10fb04 = ramfuc_reg(0x10fb04); > >> ram->fuc.r_0x10fb08 = ramfuc_reg(0x10fb08); > >> - ram->fuc.r_0x137310 = ramfuc_reg(0x137300); > >> + ram->fuc.r_0x137300 = ramfuc_reg(0x137300); > >> ram->fuc.r_0x137310 = ramfuc_reg(0x137310); > >> ram->fuc.r_0x137360 = ramfuc_reg(0x137360); > >> ram->fuc.r_0x1373ec = ramfuc_reg(0x1373ec); > >> -- > >> 2.13.3 > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Nouveau mailing list > >> Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org > >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau > _______________________________________________ > Nouveau mailing list > Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Nouveau mailing list Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau