From: Ben Skeggs <bske...@redhat.com> Programming -1 (vc_start_slot, if alloc fails) into HW probably isn't the best idea.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bske...@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <ly...@redhat.com> Acked-by: Danilo Krummrich <m...@dakr.org> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <ly...@redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c index 39e9ba4139c7d..889ff667d0293 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c @@ -916,23 +916,27 @@ nv50_msto_prepare(struct drm_atomic_state *state, struct nv50_mstc *mstc = msto->mstc; struct nv50_mstm *mstm = mstc->mstm; struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *payload; + int ret = 0; NV_ATOMIC(drm, "%s: msto prepare\n", msto->encoder.name); payload = drm_atomic_get_mst_payload_state(mst_state, mstc->port); - // TODO: Figure out if we want to do a better job of handling VCPI allocation failures here? if (msto->disabled) { drm_dp_remove_payload_part1(mgr, mst_state, payload); - nvif_outp_dp_mst_vcpi(&mstm->outp->outp, msto->head->base.index, 0, 0, 0, 0); + ret = 1; } else { if (msto->enabled) - drm_dp_add_payload_part1(mgr, mst_state, payload); + ret = drm_dp_add_payload_part1(mgr, mst_state, payload); + } + if (ret == 0) { nvif_outp_dp_mst_vcpi(&mstm->outp->outp, msto->head->base.index, payload->vc_start_slot, payload->time_slots, payload->pbn, payload->time_slots * mst_state->pbn_div); + } else { + nvif_outp_dp_mst_vcpi(&mstm->outp->outp, msto->head->base.index, 0, 0, 0, 0); } } -- 2.41.0