On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 12:27:24PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 04:22:32PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > > > When you say things like this it comes across as though you are > > > implying there are two tiers to the community. Ie those that set the > > > strategy and those that don't. > > > > This isn't true, I just ask you to consider the goals that have been set > > already, because we have been working on this already. > > Why do keep saying I haven't?
Because I haven't seen you to acknowlege that the current direction we're moving to is that we're trying to move away from Nouveau and start over with a new GSP-only solution. Instead you propose a huge architectural rework of Nouveau, extract a core driver from Nouveau and make this the long term solution. > > I have no intention of becoming involved in your project or > nouveau. My only interest here is to get an agreement that we can get > a VFIO driver (to improve the VFIO subsystem and community!) in the > near term on top of in-tree nouveau. Two aspects about this. First, Nova isn't a different project in this sense, it's the continuation of Nouveau to overcome several problems we have with Nouveau. Second, of course you have the intention of becoming involved in the Nouveau / Nova project. You ask for huge architectural changes of Nouveau, including new interfaces for a VFIO driver on top. If that's not becoming involved what else would it be? > > > > > But, we have to agree on a long term strategy and work towards the > > > > corresponding > > > > goals *together*. > > > > > > I think we went over all the options already. IMHO the right one is > > > for nova and vfio to share some kind of core driver. The choice of > > > Rust for nova complicates planning this, but it doesn't mean anyone is > > > saying no to it. > > > > This is the problem, you're many steps ahead. > > > > You should start with understanding why we want the core driver to be in > > Rust. > > You then can raise your concerns about it and then we can discuss them and > > see > > if we can find solutions / consensus. > > I don't want to debate with you about Nova. It is too far in the > future, and it doesn't intersect with anything I am doing. Sure it does. Again, Nova is intended to be the continuation of Nouveau. So, if you want to do a major rework in Nouveau (and hence become involved in the project) we have to make sure that we progress things in the same direction. How do you expect the project to be successful in the long term, if the involved parties are not willing to agree at a direction and common goals for the project? Or is it that you are simply not interested in long term? Do you have reasons to think that the problems we have with Nouveau just go away in the long term? Do you plan to solve them within Nouveau? If so, how do you plan to do that? > > > But you're not even considering it, and instead start with a counter > > proposal. > > This isn't acceptable to me. > > I'm even agreeing to a transition into a core driver in Rust, someday, > when the full community can agree it is the right time. > > What more do you want from me? I want that the people involved in the project seriously discuss and align on the direction and goals for the project in the long term and work towards them together.
