On 07/27/2010 07:54 AM, Soren Hansen wrote: > Hey, guys. > > We need to get our versioning sorted out. When I uploaded the first > packages to my PPA, it was based on the packaging in the original git > repo which read 0.3.0. Later on, after much merging around, it was > bumped back to 0.2.2. Because of this the version of the packages in > the PPA is currently 0.3.0+really0.2.2-something (because versions must > be strictly monotonically increasing). I'd like to restore some sanity > to this :)
Yes. I agree. Also note that there is a ~nova-core PPA now that you can upload packages to ... > So, we need to decide on the versioning scheme. I would have liked it if > Swift and Nova would have the same version numbers. I would also have > liked it if 1.0.0 was the version that were to come out in three months > time with the first official release. However, seeing as Swift already > has a 1.0.0 (and 1.0.1, I think) out, that's not going to work (since > they'd have go back to 1.0.0 which makes everyone unhappy, or we'd all > have to jump to 2.0.0 which seems odd). Also, more projects may join > OpenStack later on with pre-existing versioning history, so I think it > makes sense just to focus on Nova's versioning. > > As such, I'd like to propose that our first release, scheduled to come > out in about three months, will be version 1.0.0. I'd also like to > immediately bump the current version to 0.9.0, and have the packages in > the PPA be versioned something like 0.9.0+bzrXXX-0ubuntu0ppa1 where XXX > is the bzr revno of lp:nova. Agree. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nova Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nova More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
