On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya <[email protected]> wrote: > Sure, no problem. There is a datamodel refactor blueprint started by > justinsb. We definitely could have at least updated that blueprint, if not > created a new one. When we started we definitely didn't expect it to be so > big. :(
No worries, mate :) These things happen, I completely understand. Well, so what's the thought on moving forward, then? Rick and I are a bit cautious about pushing the orm-deux branch into trunk so close to code freeze. Certainly, if we did merge it for Austin, I think we'd want to re-prioritize support for non-relational data stores for early Austin +1. Do you think the new orm-deux code is stable enough? Does it have full test coverage? To make the plunge or not to make the plunge. That is the question ;) -jay _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nova Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nova More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
