No, no ping unfortunatly. I am using a Vmware EsXi server for created my topology so for connected my hosts to my openflow switches I use a Vmware virtual switches, you think the problem can come from that ?
Because when I ping, I get a "Destination Host unreachable". -- Julien Envoyé avec Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) Le lundi 21 mai 2012 à 22:58, Murphy McCauley a écrit : > This doesn't seem to be an error. Is the ping not going through? > > -- Murphy > > On May 21, 2012, at 1:52 AM, Julien Ratinaud wrote: > > Ok thank you. > > > > So here is the error I get when I use the pyswitch and spanning_tree > > components and I try to ping two host : > > http://hpics.li/d09742c > > > > Any idea ? > > 2012/5/20 Julien Ratinaud <[email protected] > > (mailto:[email protected])> > > > Hello everybody, > > > > > > The problem , if I use only pyswitch I don't get any flows. But I will > > > try tomorow morning and I will send the error I get with pyswitch. > > > > > > Me too I have a loop in my network and like you see I have some problems. > > > When you tell "add static routing in nox" how are you doing that ? Which > > > file you are modifying ? Because I have two host and they are not able to > > > ping. So I don't know how to defined the route into NOX. > > > > > > Thank You > > > > > > Julien Ratinaud > > > > > > 2012/5/20 Qingyun Zuo <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])> > > > > Hi, recently I used "routing" component in my mininet. I found that > > > > when the topology contained a loop it would lead to routing storm and > > > > produce a mass of packets. That is to say, "routing" don't solve the > > > > storm problem? > > > > My real testbed has a loop, I used to add static routing in nox and > > > > manually solve the arp reply packet. But I think that is not good when > > > > the topology becomes large. So can anybody help to solve the routing > > > > problem? > > > > > > > > 2012/5/20 <[email protected] > > > > (mailto:[email protected])> > > > > > > > > > > Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 15:07:44 -0700 > > > > > From: Murphy McCauley <[email protected] > > > > > (mailto:[email protected])> > > > > > To: Julien Ratinaud <[email protected] > > > > > (mailto:[email protected])> > > > > > Cc: [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > > > > > Subject: Re: [nox-dev] Problem sp_routing > > > > > Message-ID: > > > > > > > > > > <CAHC=y9rlbyk+hjm2_17-x+g0gr_cnds_uf0k9tlgcvtqp81...@mail.gmail.com > > > > > (mailto:y9rlbyk%2bhjm2_17-x%[email protected])> > > > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > > > > > > > > Can you try with just pyswitch? > > > > > > > > > > If you look up the error type and code in the spec, I believe it > > > > > refers to > > > > > a buffer ID being wrong. If it happens with pyswitch, looking at the > > > > > control traffic in wireshark with the OpenFlow dissector may help to > > > > > understand why. > > > > > > > > > > -- Murphy > > > > > On May 18, 2012 2:48 PM, "Julien Ratinaud" <[email protected] > > > > > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the reply but still same problem if I use only one. > > > > > > > > > > > > 2012/5/18 Murphy McCauley <[email protected] > > > > > > (mailto:[email protected])> > > > > > > > > > > > >> To start with, pyswitch and routing both do essentially the same > > > > > >> job -- > > > > > >> forward packets. You only need one or the other. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> -- Murphy > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On May 18, 2012, at 7:32 AM, Julien Ratinaud wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Hello everybody, > > > > > >> > > > > > >> I am using NOX in my Openflow network composed of four Openflow > > > > > >> switches > > > > > >> and four clients, when I ping between them, my ping is not > > > > > >> succesfull. When > > > > > >> I launch NOX, I use the component pyswitch, spanning_tree and > > > > > >> routing. On > > > > > >> my controller, I get this message : http://hpics.li/802cd61 > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Someone know where is the problem ? > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Thank you > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Best Regards, > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Julien Ratinaud > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > > > > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > > > > > URL: > > > > > <http://lists.noxrepo.org/private.cgi/nox-dev-noxrepo.org/attachments/20120518/6df4462b/attachment-0001.htm> > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > nox-dev mailing list > > > > > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > > > > > http://lists.noxrepo.org/listinfo.cgi/nox-dev-noxrepo.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > End of nox-dev Digest, Vol 3, Issue 18 > > > > > ************************************** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best Regards > > > > Zuo Qingyun > > > > > > > > > >
