Hi Min-Huyp,
Sorry I no description clearly.
The monitor.py include in zaku nox, and it is already existing in
nox/build/src/nox/coreapps/examples, I don't have changed it.
--- 11/6/21 (二)，Min-Hyup KANG <kang-min-h...@hanmail.net> 寫道：
寄件者: Min-Hyup KANG <kang-min-h...@hanmail.net>
主旨: RE: [nox-dev] about monitor.py test
收件者: "false" <ladj...@yahoo.com.tw>
日期: 2011年6月21日,二,下午9:19
#yiv213171754 p {margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;}
Hi,
Can you show me the code about rx_bytes, tx_bytes of part in monitor.py ?
--------- 원본 메일 ---------
보낸사람: false <ladj...@yahoo.com.tw>
받는사람 : nox-dev@noxrepo.org
날짜: 2011년 6월 21일 화요일, 22시 07분 15초 +0900
제목: [nox-dev] about monitor.py test
Hi,
I recently used iperf tools, ping, and ftp to test monitor.py, but the result
is so strange.
I used iperf tools do the throughput test and the test average transmission
rate is 45Mbps
between two hosts that connection with the OF Switch based NetFPGA, but
monitor.py
display rx_bytes and tx_bytes always increase only 100~300 bytes per 5 seconds,
at the same time, I using dpctl to dump flow information, the dpctl display the
n_bytes average increase is 45Mbps.
When I used ping or ftp server to do data transmission, the monitor.py display
result is
same as dpctl result.
Is the monitor.py result correctly in iperf test?
Any suggest will be helpful! Thank you!
Yi-Shou
#yiv213171754 p {font-size:10pt;font-family:돋움, gulim, tahoma, sans-serif
important;}
Best Regards,
Min-Hyup KANG
_______________________________________________
nox-dev mailing list
nox-dev@noxrepo.org
http://noxrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/nox-dev
