This is a quick update about the status of NOX.

While, over the past few years, NOX has gone from the only controller available 
to one among many controller options, we want to emphasize that NOX is still 
here and is being actively maintained and improved.  

The NOX community is largely centered around the nox-dev mailing list (which is 
relatively active -- something like 100 posts per month), and consists of a mix 
of users -- those just playing around with the technology (asking questions), 
those actively using NOX for research or other projects (reporting bugs), those 
using NOX for a commercial product, and a handful of developers (who, we hope, 
are effectively meeting the needs of the previous three groups).

There has also been some progress on NOX that hasn't been widely discussed yet. 
 Specifically, there's a new branch which we're pretty excited about. It is the 
biggest update to NOX we've seen so far, and it responds to requests from the 
community: in particular, this release involves a streamlining of the codebase 
and API, along with a sizable performance jump. We are close to making this 
branch public.

We also know that quite a few NOX users appreciate the Python interface.  We 
want to support these users even better. To that end, we've been developing POX 
-- a new controller framework written in pure Python.  We think it's pretty 
quick and easy to hack on, and it is remarkably easy to deploy.  It's still 
under active initial development, but there are a handful of projects using it 
now or that are planning to use it soon.  We aren't sure exactly when to expect 
a 1.0 release of POX, but it's coming along.

In short: NOX has a thriving community of users, both commercial and academic, 
and an active set of developers committed to maintaining and improving the 
codebase, with bugs fixed rapidly and a fairly substantial NOX upgrade on the 
way.  There's even an entirely new Python-only controller in the works to 
provide an even easier-to-use controller for those who want a Python interface. 
The comments at ONS about lack of NOX support were ill-informed and may have 
caused a bit of undue concern, and we hope this note clarifies the situation.

We remain interested in your feedback, stand ready to fix any problems you 
find, and are excited to keep the project moving forward.


Murphy McCauley
Martin Casado
Kyriakos Zarifis
Amin Tootoonchian
_______________________________________________
nox-dev mailing list
nox-dev@noxrepo.org
http://noxrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/nox-dev

Reply via email to