Hi John, Here is the text from the message I posted regarding this:
****** I enabled the positive/negative testing for Declude. http://www.noxmail.com/imail/noxbeta.zip This must use http://www.declude.com/release/165i/declude.exe (interim release) or newer. To use the No-X-Mail test this way you will need to add DECLUDETESTONLY TRUE to the NOXMAIL.NOX configuration file. It will then return a positive exitcode for SPAM and a negative exitcode for ADULT. WARNING: I was NOT able to get this to work with Declude as intended. I checked the Declude logs and the result codes are being sent properly as positive or negative values, however Declude would fail the test no matter what. I set them up as: NOXSPAM external >30 "C:\IMail\noxmail\NoXMail.exe" 15 0 NOXADULT external <30 "C:\IMail\noxmail\NoXMail.exe" 15 0 Declude was failing BOTH tests no matter what the score was. I didn't have time to test this further today, but I am sure that Noxmail is sending the correct codes. If you run the test as: NOXMAIL external nonzero "C:\IMail\noxmail\NoXMail.exe" 10 0 then the correct positive or negative result code is always recorded in the log file. So anyway, you may not want to try changing these tests on a Friday afternoon. ***** On 01/06/03 7:17am you wrote... >Brain or Scott, what is the syntax for the return code for this? > >John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA >IT Manager, Network Engineer >RelianceSoft, Inc. >Fullerton, CA 92835 >www.reliancesoft.com > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:NoX-List- >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Milburn >> Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 3:17 PM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: RE: [NoXMail] Update for Declude +- test >> >> >> Ah yes, the old "Microsoft didn't tell us the correct stuff" ploy. I know >it >> well ;-) >> >> Thanks Scott. >> >> On 01/03/03 6:13pm you wrote... >> > >> >>Brian, I am not sure that Scott said he had the positive/negative ready >> >yet. >> > >> >This is the first I've heard of an issue with negative return values. >> > >> >However, it appears there was a glitch in the code (thanks to Microsoft >> >reporting that the exit code should be an unsigned long, rather than a >> >signed long). There is a new interim release (same URL) that takes care >of >> >this issue. >> > >> >The new feature is that "greater than" and "less than", which will be in >> >the next beta (and is in the interim release, as usual). >> > -Scott >> > >> >--- >> >[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus >> >(http://www.declude.com)] >> > >> >com)] >> > >> >--- >> >[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] >> > >> > >> >Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ >> >Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> --- >> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] >> >> >> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ >> Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >@noxmail.com > >l.com > >--- >[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] > > >Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ >Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
