I won't have any ability to do that, or a report, for at least two weeks (and lots of stuff going on the month after that). It'd be great if someone else can pick it up - it doesn't require being a committer.
- Brett > On 3 Nov 2014, at 5:56 am, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: > > Any one in the community has cycles to do the pre-release docs review? > > I would be happy to, but I am not really familiar with the code to make sane > documentation comments. > > Regards, > Cos > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 03:02PM, Brett Porter wrote: >> Hi Konstantin, >> >> I don't think there's been any progress. I've been occupied on other >> projects for the last couple of months. >> >> It is ready to go other than a review of the docs which are a little stale. >> Has anyone else had a chance to look at the docs? Anyone want to try the >> release process? >> >> - Brett >> >>> On 17 Oct 2014, at 3:23 pm, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> Guys, >>> >>> are we getting anywhere closer to the 1.5.0 release? It seems to be a chunk >>> of >>> activity wrt preparation to it, which then stopped at some point. >>> >>> Can I help anyhow? >>> Regards, >>> Cos >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 02:53PM, Brett Porter wrote: >>>> I closed out or moved everything on the 1.5.0-incubating list last Friday - >>>> only thing I wanted to do next was take a pass over the getting started >>>> documentation and check that it is correct and easy to use. >>>> >>>> Does anyone have some cycles to do the same? It might be particularly >>>> helpful to get fresh eyes from a non-committer, and contributions to the >>>> documentation would be most welcome. >>>> >>>> - Brett >>>> >>>> On 24 Aug 2014, at 9:17 am, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I don't see why not. If the current state of the software is "good >>>>> enough" to >>>>> be released from the community standpoint - I'd go for it. But as always >>>>> - it >>>>> should be the PPMC, developers, and users call, of course. >>>>> >>>>> Cos >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:50AM, Lars Corneliussen // Zen wrote: >>>>>> I think we should "just release" it as it is and take it from there. >>>>>> The snapshot-version has been in use for quite a while now. >>>>>> >>>>>> Last issue to resolve would be >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NPANDAY-599 >>>>>> >>>>>> Brett, you talked about somehow caching the resolver per project. I >>>>>> think if >>>>>> that's done we're fine and can close 599 and thus 402. >>>>>> >>>>>> -----UrsprЭngliche Nachricht----- >>>>>> Von: Brett Porter [mailto:br...@porterclan.net] Im Auftrag von Brett >>>>>> Porter >>>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. August 2014 02:43 >>>>>> An: npanday-dev@incubator.apache.org >>>>>> Betreff: Re: Release 1.5.0 ?? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for the review and the nudge here Konstantin. >>>>>> >>>>>> I've just dropped a couple out, and will take a quick pass over the >>>>>> non-blockers and ones assigned to me to see what else can be closed or >>>>>> bumped. >>>>>> >>>>>> Do any others have a moment to look through them? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Brett >>>>>> >>>>>> On 19 Aug 2014, at 7:37 am, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Ladies and gentlemen. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've pocked around a little bit and it seems that there are only 4 >>>>>>> tickets (of which only 2 are real blockers) are effectively standing >>>>>>> between today and the next release of the project. One of the critical >>>>>>> is >>>>>> also an improvement. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here's what I am referring to http://is.gd/WzgibS >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am thinking if this would be a sane idea to deal with the blockers >>>>>>> and push Major bugs into 1.6-incubating? This tactic will help to get >>>>>>> the release out so the users have something new to work with. And it >>>>>>> also will provide a new development baseline for the contributors? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What do you guys think? >>>>>>> Cos >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>
