Greg Domjan created NPANDAY-636: ----------------------------------- Summary: Support .Net4 Additional option "Embed Com Interop" to ArtifactType.COM_REFERENCE Key: NPANDAY-636 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NPANDAY-636 Project: NPanday Issue Type: Improvement Components: Maven Plugins, Visual Studio Add-in Affects Versions: 1.5.0-incubating Reporter: Greg Domjan
Visual studio makes available when compiling a .NetFramework 4 module, for references that are Interop/com a new option "Embed Interop Types". This option swaps between using /reference to /link and also manages Copy Local where an embedded /link[ed] item doesn't need to be copied to the output location. About embedded Interop types Vs Primary Interop Assemblies (PIA) Where MS suggest * a preference for embedded as it is more flexible for multiple versions of an interface * Interop that is not embedded, should ideally be signed and identified as primary for security. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/vstudio/3y76b69k%28v=vs.100%29.aspx http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd997297(v=vs.100).aspx About compilation http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/538aes2a%28v=vs.110%29.aspx http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd264728(v=vs.110).aspx My understanding is that these Interop modules are not attached/kept as output for maven, rather rebuilt in downstream as necessary. It seems that if not embedding, then it is more appropriate to have the Interop as a seperate module. Makes me wonder if COM_REFERENCE is an appropriate dependency if not embedding, could COM_REFERENCE imply embedding? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)