I am a novice to the internals of ns-2. I would appreciate it if you can
tell me where the mistake it. Looking at the structural diagram did not
give me any answers w/ respect to multiple interfaces!
Thanks,
Sita


>
> I am not sure if you are talking about this problem on routing agent...If
> yes, it is normal since if you checked the structurural diagram of a
> mobile node in NS2, you can find out that once the packet reaches the
> destination, the address classifier and port classifier will forward it in
> different way and the recv() in routing agent does not get invoked at
> all...The solution also lies in that structural diagram!!!Think about the
> condition on which address classifier and port classfier will make
> different selection!!
>
> Hailun Tan
>>
>> Hi There,
>> Thank you again for the reply. This is not my work, I am trying to use
>> something from NRL for my WSN work. Basically they have multiple
>> interfaces to a node. One channel carries just sensing info and another
>> channel is used for routing to sink. They want the sensing info to come
>> to
>> the agent, so that it can send info about it to the sink on the other
>> channel. That is why they have the up-target statement in the tcl code.
>> By
>> doing this, I was hoping the recv will come to the agent and it can
>> handle
>> it, but it does not. So I am not sure if the problem is in the interface
>> implementation or somewhere else. Please share your thoughts.
>> Regards,
>> Sita
>>
>>
>>> Hi again,
>>>
>>> Yes I understand a little more of what you are trying to accomplish,
>>> but
>>> i
>>> still have some questions; Are you modifying an existing routing
>>> protocol
>>> in ns2? Do packets get forwarded correctly from source to destination
>>> according to your Mac level trace? If the packets don't get forwarded
>>> there is as you say something wrong with the link layer's connection to
>>> the network layer (Your Router-module). When I designed my routing
>>> protocol I started out with AODV and modified it. Also there are some
>>> pictures of the architecture of the ns2 layers on the Internet that may
>>> help you. And finally, you say that you changed some thing in the Link
>>> layer's up target so your routing module will be the receiver of
>>> packets,
>>> I'm not sure if you need to do that, if I remember correctly a
>>> classifier
>>> gets the packet from the link layer and the classifier decides if the
>>> packet shall be sent to the routing module for processing (forwarding)
>>> or
>>> if the packet shall be sent to agent level (when the pac
>>> ket have reached it's destination).
>>>
>>> Regards Micke
>>>
>>> ----- Originalmeddelande -----
>>> Från: "Sita S. Krishnakumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Datum: Tisdag, Januari 24, 2006 16:58
>>> Ämne: Re: [ns] Agent::recv method not reached
>>>
>>>> Mikael,
>>>> Thanks for your reply. I have more information that may shed more
>>>> light on
>>>> the problem.
>>>> I basically have a new agent designed. In my code, I specify that
>>>> the link
>>>> layer's 'up-target' is my agent node so that it can come to my
>>>> recv() for
>>>> processing. But looks like that is not working fine.
>>>> The MAC layer receives the packet but the agent does not. That is
>>>> why I
>>>> see it in the MAC trace but not in the agent trace. Even if it
>>>> does not
>>>> come to  my recv(), it should go to the agent's recv() - but it
>>>> does not
>>>> go there either. So I am not sure where it goes altogether. Also I
>>>> am not
>>>> sure what the 'add-ll' does when an agent is created. I am trying
>>>> to add
>>>> someone else's work. I am not sure why they didn't have an add-ll
>>>> statement.
>>>> This is work from NRL and they say it works in 2.27, I am trying
>>>> to get it
>>>> to work in 2.29
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Sita
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > Hi,
>>>> >
>>>> > I had a similar problem, but I?m not sure if I understand
>>>> exactly what you
>>>> > mean.
>>>> > If you are sending one packet from "source" to "destination"
>>>> over some
>>>> > number of intermediate nodes, you will only see the packet at
>>>> agent level,
>>>> > if you have that trace level turned on in ns2 and you will only
>>>> see it at
>>>> > the source and destination node. If you want to do something
>>>> with your
>>>> > routing protocol when a data packet has been received at the
>>>> destination> you have to understand that ns2's layers don't
>>>> exactly work as the OSI
>>>> > reference model. When a data packet reaches it's destination a
>>>> classifier> sends it to the agent layer, so you will never see
>>>> this packet at the
>>>> > router layer(Network layer). If I remember correctly this has
>>>> some thing
>>>> > to do with the mobile node class. I know for a fact that the AODVUU
>>>> > implementation uses a newer class where packets are received and
>>>> sent> bottom up through all layers. So you could use this class or
>>>> use a
>>>> > function in agent::recev and call a function in your class but
>>>> to do this
>>>> > you have to get hold of that object created by ns2 if you
>>>> > create a new one and do the call you will not be able to get
>>>> access to
>>>> > memory allocations done by your class. For more info on how to
>>>> this Pedro
>>>> > Vale Estrela posted some code that I used on this forum some
>>>> month a go.
>>>> > Hope this can help you in some way.
>>>> >
>>>> > Best regards, Micke J
>>>> > ----- Originalmeddelande -----
>>>> > Från: "Sita S. Krishnakumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> > Datum: Mondag, Januari 23, 2006 15:11
>>>> > Ämne: [ns] Agent::recv method not reached
>>>> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Hello,
>>>> >> I am trying to add a new routing protocol to ns-2. There are
>>>> >> packets being
>>>> >> generated and received by the nodes (i see it in the MAC trace),
>>>> >> but it
>>>> >> never reaches my recv() method. On stepping through, I saw that the
>>>> >> Agent::recv() is not reached and hence it is not getting forwarded
>>>> >> to my
>>>> >> code for processing (no agent traces get printed out in the
>>>> trace file
>>>> >> about packets being received) . Any ideas on why this is happening?
>>>> >> Thanks for your help.
>>>> >> Regards,
>>>> >> Sita
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This email and any attachments may be confidential. They may contain
> legally
> privileged information or copyright material. You should not read, copy,
> use or disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an intended
> recipient, please contact us at once by return email and then delete both
> messages. We do not accept liability in connection with computer virus,
> data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised
> amendment. This notice should not be removed.
>




Reply via email to