I got similar question as Alaeddine. For example, if I want to compare the performance of TCP and UDP under some scenarios, which kind of application should I attach?
Regards, Kai -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sasan Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 10:03 AM To: alaeddine abdallah Cc: ns users Subject: Re: [ns] CBR over TCP ? TCP has its own estimation of stable link and suitable time to send the packet, so usually it is avoided. at least it is the case with me. S. On 2/27/06, alaeddine abdallah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > In my knowledge in NS, we use UDP to simulate CBR traffic since it is a > Constant Bit Rate. But if we simulate CBR with TCP as a transport agent, > the > simulation works but only the packet size declared int the TCP layer is > considered and not that of the CBR traffic. > > > So my question is: is it logic to simulate CBR traffic with TCP or not? > > and conversaly , can we simulate FTP application with UDP ? > > thanks a lot. > > regards Alaeddine > -- Plan for things to go wrong, Design for things to go right S+