Hi!

> David Fuste schrieb:
>
>> First of all, thank you very much to all...I thought the post was 
>> lost :) Martina, your information has been very useful.
>> And second, thanks Pedro, I will look for this code in the cvs that 
>> partially supports infrastructure WLAN simulation.
>
>
> Interesting. I was not aware of this code but I am not doing WLAN 
> simulations myself anyway. Can you post your experiences when you use 
> it? Might be helpful for a lot of other people, too.
>
Ok, I have to do some work in this area. I will post my experiences as 
soon as possible...

>>> I 've also heard abt NOAH but I can find any documentation on ow to 
>>> use it.
>>> I mean, the way it is explain; says a node can send  a message to a 
>>> BS(Base
>>> Station) but details as to ow to send a msg to anoda node thru the 
>>> BS isn't
>>> included (I mean, it's rare to keep sendin msges to a BS unless one 
>>> intends
>>> to send to anoda mobile node).
>>
>
> Hmmm. I've only ever made simulations (actually not myself, a student 
> of mine did) with WLAN + NOAH where traffic comes from wired host 
> nodes, goes through the AP and then to the mobile nodes. Iow. a 
> typical wired-cum-wireless scenario. I have never actually tried to 
> have traffic from one wireless node to the other.
>
> Basically, NOAH is a routing module that allows you to manually set 
> routes. It does _not_ change the MAC layer in any way. So, I believe 
> that if you set up NOAH and set up the routing table accordingly it 
> /should/ work if you simply set the traffic agent on one mobile node 
> and the sink on the other. The traffic should then be forced by the 
> routing to first go to the BS and then go to the other mobile. I can't 
> remember if the MAC layer is/should be significantly different for 
> infrastructure mode as compared to ad-hoc mode but if you can live 
> with the MAC as-is you should be able to get what you want with NOAH.

It sounds as static routing...so, I understand there is no "dynamic" 
mobility support with NOAH (even without scanning/assoc/auth, only as 
attachment)...There is a lot of work to do :)

Bye!
and Thanks!

Reply via email to