On Wednesday 23 August 2006 16:21, Pedro Fortuna wrote: > No, not that I know. > But it shouldnt be too hard to extend the existing one...
OK you are definitely kidding, have you seen the rfc specification of FTP? At least for me hard is not defined by how mind challenging is a task but by the time it consumes, and my estimate is that it needs considerable time to have an FTP implementation. Especially since we are talking on an abandoned project like ns. I am considering moving my simulations to PlanetLab and waiting for the arrival of Internet2 but I am hugely disappointed by the potential not exploited of ns. At least when I see an Application/FTP interface I am expecting to do what it says. If I hadn't checked the source code deviating from my main work I wouldn't know ( and it's bad not to deliver what you promiss). ggeorgak > On 8/23/06, Giorgis Georgakoudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >From what I see there is no ftp implementation in ns, more precisely > > > > what "seems" like ftp application is a tcl Application/FTP object that > > the only thing it does is to send packets through a tcp connection. So is > > there a real ftp implementation that complies to the standard? > > > > ggeorgak
