[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Send Ns-users mailing list submissions to ns-users@isi.edu To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/ns-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Ns-users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. How can I get nonwireless id in classifier.cc (Nirex) 2. Problem in M/M/m Queueing system implementation. (Mayur M Vegad) 3. How can i get M/M/m queueing system implementation in ns. (Karan ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 13:31:03 +0100 From: "Nirex" Subject: [ns] How can I get nonwireless id in classifier.cc To: Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Hello, I want to create simulation of network with using cisco routers with their access lists. I decided that particular access list of routers I would store to particular node. If I understand working of NS correctly I can catch incoming packet for some node in: classifier.cc in void Classifier::recv(Packet* p, Handler*h) Incoming packet has header. There is prev_hop (it could be actual node) in packet header. hdr_cmn *cmnh; cmnh = hdr_cmn::access(p); prev_hop = cmnh->prev_hop(); Bui If I use it it still return 0 Please, could you help me? Or could you tell me another way, how I can get id of actual nonwireles node. Thanx a lot Jiri Macku ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 07:08:14 -0800 (PST) From: Mayur M Vegad Subject: [ns] Problem in M/M/m Queueing system implementation. To: ns-users@ISI.EDU Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Dear all, We have to implement M/M/m queueing system (eg m = 5 servers), with no buffer , lamda = 400 and mu = 10ms. Should we keep the Queue_limit ZERO or ONE for NO_BUFFER case here? We doubt because this gives all the packets (100%) dropped, while making the Queue_limit 2 (and more) reduces the dropped packets to less than 16%. Note: We used array of nodes for multiple servers and used array of UDP agents to attach with each of them. Will be thankful if someone can give a little hint on where we mistake! regards, Mayur --------------------------------- Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Ns-users mailing list Ns-users@isi.edu http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/ns-users End of Ns-users Digest, Vol 51, Issue 2 *************************************** --------------------------------- Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
