Hi Heni, Can you list ur simulation parameters. Then, we can discuss. Thanks.
Cheers, Charley Cheng Heni.K wrote: > > HI Mr Charley Cheng, > Hi everyone > > I’m a student who have the some probleme and I need to value the facts of > multipath routing in > mobile ad hoc networks in terms of Packet Loss compared to AODV protocol. > I works in ns2.34 . > the results found for AOMDV are always worse than AODV protocol. > Can you help me in this context? > Thank you very much. > > Héni. > > > > > > Charley Cheng wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> I am trying to reproduce the simulations results of AOMDV paper. I >> followed the same parameters described in the paper, which are listed >> below: >> 1. Network size: 1000m*1000m >> 2. Number of nodes: 100 nodes >> 3. Radio transmission range: 250m >> 4. Channel bit rate: 2Mb/s >> 5. 50 CBR/UDP connections; each connection strats at a random time during >> the intial 100s of the simulation and stay till the end >> 6. Packet size: 512 bytes >> 7. Packet rate: 1 packets/s >> 8. Simulation time: 1000s with the inital 250s taken as the warmup period >> >> Moreover, according to AOMDV paper, I also disabled expanding ring search >> and local repair, and enabled periodic hello messages for neighborhood >> information maintenance by disabling link layer detection. >> >> Based on the above parameters, I ran simulations for AODV in varying node >> speed (from 1 m/s to 30 m/s). I got the packet loss from 6.14% to 54%. >> However, the latency (or end-to-end delay) is very low (below 0.11s). It >> is not reasonable. So, could anyone tell me what are the problems I >> encountered? Thanks in advance. >> >> Charley Cheng >> > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Performance-of-AODV-tp27844400p28724664.html Sent from the ns-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
