The Henry Atkinson MS has several commonly notated ornaments -

* A pair of vertical lines over a note:  ||
* A pair of diagonal lines over a note:  \\
* A pair of diagonal lines through the vertical of a note.

These are easy to distinguish and are often used together, eg in the
Reed House Rant.
What did they mean? Does anyone know, or was it ambiguous then?

John

-----Original Message-----
From: Philip Gruar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 22 September 2008 21:33
To: nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [NSP] Re: Fool, fearing to tread, aka Peacock marks


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "NSP group" <nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 1:09 PM
Subject: [NSP] Re: Fool, fearing to tread, aka Peacock marks


> Otherwise you could apply the "leavitoutement" - an obscure but very
> useful early music ornament, which to the best of my knowledge was
> either invented by, or at least publicised by, Philip Gruar in his
> early music manifestation.

I wish I had invented it - I certainly use it regularly. Unfortunately I

can't lay claim to it, or to any of the others (like squeakement - an 
ornament very well-known to pipers) which have long been going the
rounds 
among people who regularly have to cope with all the genuine French
Baroque 
ornaments. Another one, "pegment sans appui" is perhaps better known to 
string-players.

If it's of any use I'll add my early-music twopennorth. (note to other 
Baroque-music specialists out there - this is inevitably simplified and 
probably contentious, but I hope you'll agree with the broad gist)
Although the French composers in particular were very precise in their 
notation of ornaments, often giving a table of what they all meant at
the 
beginning of a publication, other composers were extremely vague. For 
example the little cross often found over notes in 18th century music 
frequently means just some indeterminate ornament - probably a short
trill, 
but just as readily a mordent or whatever suits the music at that point.
In 
the eighteenth century much more was usually left to the players' 
discretion, even in "classical" music (that is, not "traditional" or
"folk") 
than later became the rule.

SO - we don't need to search for an exact interpretation of the Peacock 
"trill" sign, and we probably don't have to take all the notes as
absolute 
gospel either. 




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


Reply via email to