Hi Anthony,

Obviously I don't have your knowledge and background of Northumbrian music, so I don't have the same depth of feeling for these matters that you do. My purpose in following the threads on this group is to get an understanding of piping as it is, and was, from experienced people like you, and this is an incredibly rich source of knowledge. Because there is such a diverse range of opinions, often based on historical or geographical connections, often deeply held, the picture is rich and colourful. Long may that continue.

You are perhaps correct that the direct relevance of masonry to the first 30 tunes is had to see, and maybe a new title was appropriate, but as a "thread" of thought I felt it was pertinent, and indeed the mason's decision was perhaps food for thought. I don't think there is any wish to gloss over the heritage, just a lack of knowledge, which is why your contribution is so valued.

Re "many of these pieces were still
  being played by a strong cohort of traditional musicians in north
  Northumberland in a style which pleased them and fitted their needs
  extremely well."

Do you feel, as you have used the past tense, that this is no longer so? Is the (North?) "Northumbrian" style of playing lost apart from recordings? Has it been subsumed by Tyneside influences? Which current players do you feel best demonstrate that style? Is that style better/truer then other styles currently in evidence? Should any style be preserved in aspic or should we accept evolution, whilst treasuring, and being influenced by styles of the past be they on vinyl or in mp3?

Discuss.

Tim
----- Original Message ----- From: "Anthony Robb" <anth...@robbpipes.com> To: "NSP group" <nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu>; "Richard York" <rich...@lizards.force9.co.uk>
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 6:20 AM
Subject: [NSP] Re: First 30 tunes



  Sorry to butt in folks, especially since I'm not sure what the exact
  context is! As the subject matter is the First 30 tunes the relevance
  of Victorian / Medieval masonry  escapes me. I do get the impression,
  Richard, that you might be regarding these tunes as treasures from an
  earlier age. Let me reassure you that many of these pieces were still
  being played by a strong cohort of traditional musicians in north
  Northumberland in a style which pleased them and fitted their needs
  extremely well.  It is the lack of appreciation of this and the fact
  that they played their "reels"  with a phrasing that was neither march,
  polka or reel. This pulse fitted the dance step of choice, the Rant, so
  perfectly that they referred to  the tunes themselves as rants.
  This was far more than a social pastime for the likes of Will Atkinson
  whose payment from "The Tanner Hops" made his, Bella's and their 10
  bairns lives, much more bearable. It is the glossing over of this
  unique heritage that drives me to bring it to a wider audience. If you
  haven't already done so buy Will Atkinson's wonderful CD and you'll see
  what I mean.
  Regards
  Anthony



  --- On Wed, 11/3/09, Richard York <rich...@lizards.force9.co.uk> wrote:

    From: Richard York <rich...@lizards.force9.co.uk>
    Subject: [NSP] Re: First 30 tunes
    To: "NSP group" <nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu>
    Date: Wednesday, 11 March, 2009, 8:48 PM

  In a way, that's the least important part of the story   :)
  It struck me at the time what a parallel it was with our treatment of
  music which comes to us from before our time, or at least before deadly
  accurate sound recording, whether it's medieval or anything else.
  But to answer your question, Tim,  if I remember aright, he treated
  them each variously according to how much was evident from the original
  form, how much damage the dear Victorians had done, and in what
  condition and how stable each was. Perhaps that's relevant too.
  Best wishes,
  Richard.
  tim rolls BT wrote:
  >
  >
  >
  >
  >
  >> Hi Richard,
  >>
  >> Don't leave us hanging........ what did he choose to do?
  >>
  >>
  >> Tim
  >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard York"
  <[1]rich...@lizards.force9.co.uk>
  >> To: "NSP group" <[2]...@cs.dartmouth.edu>
  >> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 6:10 PM
  >> Subject: [NSP] Re: First 30 tunes
  >>
  >>
  >>>
  >>> Some years ago I met a man who was responsible for some work on the
  >>> musicians carvings in  Beverley Minster, most famous of course
  being the
  >>> pipers.
  >>> His quandary was whether to simply clean them up as they were, or
  to
  >>> restore them to what the Victorians had imposed on them, mistakes
  and
  >>> all, or to try to restore them to what he thought the medieval
  carvers
  >>> had intended, though that last was now very impossible to do with
  any
  >>> certainty, given changes in their condition over time, so he'd be
  >>> imposing on them. And whatever he did would be right for some
  people,
  >>> wrong for others, and whatever he did they'd never be as they once
  used
  >>> to be.
  >>> Or he could simply leave them to fall to bits by themselves.
  >>>
  >>> Richard.
  >>>
  >>> Anthony Robb wrote:
  >>>>
  >>>> <...>
  >>>>    There is much room for personal interpretation on top of this
  basic
  >>>>    style difference. Letting people hear these differences is
  important.
  >>>>    As for so-called "bad habits" these must surely be/have been
  pleasing
  >>>>    to the players themselves at some point and are therefore valid
  in
  >>>>    their own right even if others may find them displeasing.
  Copying these
  >>>>    personal idiosyncracies is one thing, and each player can
  decide this
  >>>>    for themselves, ignoring the regional accent completely is
  another
  >>>>    thing altogether!
  >>>>    I would say go for it Colin, a person with your background can
  not help
  >>>>    but make a valuable contribution to the body of piping
  knowledge.
  >>>>    As aye
  >>>>    Anthony
  >>>>
  >>>>
  >>>
  >>>
  >>>
  >>> To get on or off this list see list information at
  >>> [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  >>
  >>
  >>
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  ---------
  >>
  >>
  >>
  >> No virus found in this incoming message.
  >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  >> Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.10/1995 - Release Date:
  03/11/09 08:28:00
  >>
  >
  >
  >

  --

References

1. http://uk.mc11.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=rich...@lizards.force9.co.uk
  2. http://uk.mc11.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=...@cs.dartmouth.edu
  3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.10/1995 - Release Date: 03/11/09 08:28:00


Reply via email to