Hello Philip and all Alice Burn was down yesterday and was stunningly fluent as usual on both F and G chanters (F by Colin Ross in the Clough pattern and G by Mike Nelson in the Reid pattern) she reckons there is very little to choose between them as both have their good (and bad) points the important thing is getting used to them - she does find it a bit hard sometimes going from one set to the other at concerts and wishes there could have been just one design which people had stuck to. Having heard her play a wonderful full on reel in E major in duet with Catriona MacDonald last year on her G set I would say that it's not necessarily the case that E major is out of bounds for the agile fingered - it sounded great but she's a master of pressue control and has a very accurate ear. All things considered I would say do it that/your way. The owner(s) will get used to that design and, knowing your instruments, will enjoy every minute of the familiarisation process. Anthony --- On Tue, 10/5/11, Philip Gruar <phi...@gruar.clara.net> wrote:
From: Philip Gruar <phi...@gruar.clara.net> Subject: [NSP] Re: even more on G and D To: nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu Date: Tuesday, 10 May, 2011, 13:33 So... Can I (temporarily?) get this thread back on track and ask my original question again? There have been some promising replies coming - and Adrian began to develop a useful thread which has now gone off into rarefied realms of temperament and drones when playing in C major. However ... If I make a "normal" 14-key chanter, designed around playing in G and D, with just low B and C keys ARRANGED B-LEFT C-RIGHT plus a C# on the right-hand side, BUT (and this seems to be a critical factor) without a low A, am I going to produce a wierd one-off thing which will annoy future players who may own it after the immediate client passes on, OR will I be helping forward a more logical trend of pipe-making and playing? (sorry about the catitals - I'm not shouting, just emphasising :-) ) Philip ----- Original Message ----- From: "Julia Say" <[1]julia....@nspipes.co.uk> To: <[2]nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu>; <[3]a....@ntlworld.com>; <[4]christopher.bi...@ec.europa.eu> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 11:57 AM Subject: [NSP] Re: even more on G and D > On 10 May 2011, [5]Christopher.Birch@ec.europa.e wrote: > >> I don't understand the reference to temperament here. > > It may be irrelevant, Chris, I'm rather busy and have a lot going on in my head. I > don't claim to have thoroughly thought through every word of my posting. > > Julia > > > > > To get on or off this list see list information at > [6]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=julia....@nspipes.co.uk 2. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu 3. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=a....@ntlworld.com 4. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=christopher.bi...@ec.europa.eu 5. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=Christopher.Birch@ec.europa.e 6. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html