Never mind about If Hull and West Ham do this or that, who are you going to
have in to replace Mick?

On 16 April 2010 22:54, Steven Millward <millward....@gmail.com> wrote:

> OK.  Even if one were to accept a modicum of logic to your argument and not
> just banging a point of view to which you are too committed to change, who
> are we going to get in as manager?
>
> Last time we had this debate you suggested Paul Ince, who went on to fail
> spectacularly at Blackburn.
>
> I just don't see who there is to attract that is less risk than continuing
> with Mick.  Why would anyone from a team higher and more established in the
> Premier League come to Wolves?  And why would any manager from Italy or
> Spain come to Wolves?  And do any managers from the lower divisions offer
> greater security than continuing with Mick.
>
> The answer to all three is "no" for me, but I'd love to hear who it should
> be?
>
> You said he would never get us promoted and he did, and said he wouldn't
> keep us up but he has.  You'll probably say he won't take us to a top ten
> finish but he has proven you wrong several times before, so why not this
> time?
>
> I agree that we definitely do need a manager that can beat the likes of
> Redknapp at a tactical level though.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 15 April 2010 22:43, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com>wrote:
>
>>  *"**He's played a simple game the second half of the season to guarantee
>> survival.*" - that's because he's a simple man.
>>
>>
>> He stated on the pre-season tour that his aim was to finish 17th, so if a
>> simple game plan is all that is needed to guarantee survival, why hasn't he
>> employed the same simple tactic from the opening day of the season rather
>> than constantly changing players, formations and then playing players out of
>> position.  He knew from day one what he had at his disposal as he was the
>> one that bought them.
>>  ------------------------------
>>  *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
>> Behalf Of *Paul Taylor
>> *Sent:* Friday, 16 April 2010 3:37 PM
>>
>> *To:* Wolves
>> *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] MM to be replaced at end of season?
>>
>>   Isn't 4-5-1 a tactic, as well as not changing the side from week to
>> week also a tactic.
>>
>> Given the total lack of mega-million pound talent on our books, he's done
>> a great job. We surely have to be happy with where we are, and given some
>> more funds next season I'm sure he'll be able to reveal more of his
>> "tactics". He's played a simple game the second half of the season to
>> guarantee survival.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Subject: RE: [NSWolves] MM to be replaced at end of season?
>> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:17:42 +1000
>> From: marcus.chan...@macquarie.com
>> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
>>
>> I agree that there have been some good performances this season, but I
>> think our current position in the table is more a reflection of how bad some
>> of the teams below us have been (particularly Hull & Burnley) and also the
>> fact that Pompey have imploded, rather than any reflection of the genius
>> that MM possesses.  Even though we currently sit in 14th position we are
>> still only 3 points from a relegation spot with only our goal difference
>> giving us any kind of security over the teams below us.
>>
>> If we do finish mid-table by stringing a couple of wins together before
>> the end of the season then great, but MM hasn't displayed any signs that
>> indicate that he can lift this side from a technical/tactical point of
>> view.  If we have aspirations of challenging the top half of the table in
>> the next few years then we need to be looking at managers of a slightly
>> higher calibre who can challenge the likes of Mancini, O'Neill, Moyes,
>> Redknapp et al on a tactical level, and I personally don't think Mick has
>> that in him.
>>
>> I don't think MM should be sacked on basis of under-performance.  His
>> achievements should be acknowledged and at the same time he should be
>> encouraged to stand-aside in the interests of furthering the progress of
>> Wolverhampton Wanderers (which would coincide with him walking out the exit
>> door with a nice payout).  A 1970 Bedford Bus might be sufficient to get a
>> team to-and-from matches in the lower divisions but when it comes to
>> competing at the highest level (including Europe) the Bedford simply isn't
>> going to cut it and the club would need to upgrade its equipment.  Coaching
>> staff are like pieces of equipment, they can perform to a certain level but
>> if you want to move past that level, you need to be better equipped with
>> more refined and more flexible tools.  Whilst MM is most certainly a tool,
>> he's not the right type to get us any higher in this division.
>>
>> Just my thoughts (in a totally non-negative way).
>>
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
>> Behalf Of *Steven Millward
>> *Sent:* Thursday, 15 April 2010 10:58 AM
>> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] MM to be replaced at end of season?
>>
>>  A number of people on here said at the end of previous seasons that he'd
>> taken us as far as he could and we're now looking like finishing mid-table
>> in one of the world's best leagues.  Presumably this continues every season
>> until it goes wrong and all the nay-sayers can say "See, I told you Mick was
>> no good."  Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
>>
>> I don't see what the goals-for total has got to do with it when points win
>> prizes.  Remember "One nil to the Arsenal?"
>>
>> If MM gets sacked for what he's done this season then we should all be
>> worried about our jobs as no one is safe.  There have been plenty of good
>> performances this season season to make it enjoyable, and almost offset the
>> tedium of negativity from so-called Wolves fans.
>>
>> On 13 April 2010 17:51, Paul Crowe <pcr...@contechengineering.com> wrote:
>>
>>  Absolutely Buckley’s chance of this happening. The intention of my email
>> was to explore what people think we need to do in terms of us consolidating
>> our position in the Premier League?
>>
>>
>>
>> One argument is that MM has taken us as far as possible and we need
>> someone with different ideas / skills to take us to the next level. Another
>> is that MM has had his best ever year in the Prem, has learned a lot and
>> should be given an opportunity next season to improve the team further.
>>
>>
>>
>> It will be interesting to see who MM buys in the summer, hopefully he can
>> get most of the money back on the Hoff, Halford and Surman. Cash in on SEB
>> his heart doesn’t seem to be in it for us anymore.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
>> Behalf Of *Paul Taylor
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 13 April 2010 5:07 PM
>> *To:* Wolves
>>
>> *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] MM to be replaced at end of season?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Maybe so, but what are the chances of that happening? How can we get rid
>> of "our best Manager in 30 years"?
>>
>> Next year with more confidence, our run won't be built upon our defence
>> like this year (which has been pretty good in comparison to others). With a
>> bit more dosh and quality MM may be able to build the squad, but will he
>> spend wisely enough? I can't see him being booted unless we are in trouble.
>> It will be a big call if he is let go.
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> Subject: RE: [NSWolves] MM to be replaced at end of season?
>> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:38:55 +1000
>> From: marcus.chan...@macquarie.com
>> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
>>
>> hear, hear
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
>> Behalf Of *Paul Crowe
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 13 April 2010 4:27 PM
>> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
>> *Subject:* [NSWolves] MM to be replaced at end of season?
>>
>> Who thinks we should replace MM at the end of the season?
>>
>>
>>
>> Let’s face it 10 goals in all home games this season is not going to be
>> acceptable again!!
>>
>>
>>
>> As for the 4-5-1 tactics that have apparently saved our season, these will
>> not work again next season. Other Manager’s now know how we play and will
>> change tactics to beat us.
>>
>>
>>
>> As much as I like the man I think he has taken us as far as he can and is
>> capable of. He should be given a big pat on the back, a nice golden
>> handshake and sent on his way. Moxey can join him at the Taxi rank as well.
>>
>>
>>
>> Time for a new broom and fresh ideas.
>>
>>
>>
>> Paul Crowe
>>
>> Sales Manager - Asia Pacific
>>
>>
>>
>> ConTech (Sydney Office)
>>
>>
>>
>> PO Box 3517
>>
>> Rhodes Waterside
>>
>> Rhodes NSW  2138
>>
>> Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542
>>
>> Mob: 0406009562
>>
>> Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com
>>
>> Website: www.contechengineering.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid The information contained in
>> this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may
>> not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should
>> destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails
>> or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and
>> may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> Looking for a hot date? View photos of singles in your 
>> area!<http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/150855801/direct/01/>
>>
>> --
>> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
>>
>> --
>> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
>> --
>> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
>> ------------------------------
>> Looking for a hot date? View photos of singles in your 
>> area!<http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/150855801/direct/01/>
>>
>> --
>> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
>>
>> --
>> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
>>
>
>

-- 
Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid

Subscription settings: http://groups.google.com/group/nswolves/subscribe?hl=en

Reply via email to