Our chances are looking better. ________________________________
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com <nswolves@googlegroups.com> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com <nswolves@googlegroups.com> Sent: Fri Feb 11 19:36:24 2011 Subject: Re: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified] Keane now out for SIX weeks with a calf strain. Shame. On 7 February 2011 15:01, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> wrote: It’s interesting to note that the 3 teams you have selected are also the teams that have the highest number of games where they haven’t scored = 9 games. West Brom also have the fewest clean sheets so far this season (1). In my opinion, West Ham are a reasonable chance to stay up as they added some good signings during the transfer window (most notably Robbie Keane who can score enough goals to keep them up). I think that Blackpool will continue their current run of 5 consecutive defeats and fall into the relegation zone. Blackpool have conceded the highest number of goals (49) and also have the highest average goals conceded per game (1.96). For relegation I’m going for: · Blackpool · Wigan · West Brom Depending on who the baggies get as their new manager there is a chance that they will put a few good results together as the players try to prove themselves to the new boss. I hope they don’t get Roy Hodgson as I think that would help them stay in the premier league. If Roy does go to the Baggies then I’d swap them for us as the 3rd team to be relegated. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 1:31 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified] I've just been looking at the fixtures for the bottom six teams. My informed guess at this point is that the three relegated teams will be: 18. West Ham 19. Wigan 20. West Brom I think Birmingham and Wolves will get enough points from the teams they have to play. Blackpool will just scrape by. Anyone else care to stick their neck out now and we'l compare at the end of the season? On 7 February 2011 12:48, Steven Millward <millward....@gmail.com> wrote: Don't have HD. I couldn't see it on the normal 2 On 7 February 2011 11:50, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> wrote: Failure number 2. It was shown again in all it’s glory on Fox Sports 2 HD yesterday afternoon. They replay all of the matches back-to-back every Sunday. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 11:34 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified] I am ashamed. I didn't realise it was tea time kick off. If it had been shown again I would have watched it but I did trawl through three days of Foxtel programme info to find the replay, which surely is a small form of contrition? What shall we do on my birthday/Wolves do? I like the idea of a Middy Marathon but I think my brain is writing cheques that my body can't cash any more. On 7 February 2011 11:06, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> wrote: You should be ashamed Steve. 4:30am kick-off should be a reasonable time for a parent with a young child. Surely it would be very close to your normal wake up time and for a match of such magnitude any extra effort required should have been made, but to watch it 3 days late is just appalling!! From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 11:02 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified] I need my sleep. I shall watch it on Tuesday night. On 7 February 2011 10:59, Rog & Reet <rognr...@exemail.com.au> wrote: Milijas is my man and my head’s not for turning. Sure you’d be a fan as well if you watched us. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 10:50 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified] No need to deny that you love Mick and Henry. On 7 February 2011 10:40, Rog & Reet <rognr...@exemail.com.au> wrote: Hey, hang on a minute, it was only one pass. Maybe he thought Hennessey was running down the right and instinct took over. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 10:34 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified] Rog just compared Henry's passing to Milijas's.......I'm converted. Foley to the bench instead.... ________________________________ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog & Reet Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 09:31 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified] Yes, even a monkey typing will come up with something that’s not total rubbish eventually. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 10:22 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified] Are you supporting Mick in his choice to play Henry there Rog? On 7 February 2011 10:18, Rog & Reet <rognr...@exemail.com.au> wrote: Er, can I be a dissenting voice? Think Henry does his job of protecting the back line well and he even tried a 50 yard Milijas type pass, once. Never watched the match Steve?????? Did you think the castrati would put out the reserves again? We certainly deserved the win. Thought the inclusion from the start of players who can hold and pass the ball like Milijas and O’Hara made the difference from the Notlob abomination. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 9:58 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified] Everyone finally starting to realise that Henry is over hyped and useless...and now I'm hearing he's in the England squad...what is this world coming to? He's the most negative player ever....can't hold onto the ball and just has to pass it back...he frustrates me so much. On a more positive note...Hamill and O'hara making a difference already...if Macarthy plays Hunt ahead of Hamill he should be white coated. ________________________________ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 08:54 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves Definitely deserved to get the result. United didn’t create much after the first 15-20 minutes. Henry is still tripe though. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 9:52 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves Did anyone watch the Wolves match? I am recording it tomorrow. Was it deserved? On 7 February 2011 09:48, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> wrote: Fickle supporters. Surely there’s nothing else to do in Newcastle so not sure why they left. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog & Reet Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 9:45 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves Happier than those Newcastle fans who walked out after 26 minutes. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 9:24 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves http://www.toffeeweb.com/season/10-11/comment/fan/17142.html Marcus Chantry Associate Director ½ Senior Product Manager ½ Macquarie Life Banking and Financial Services Group ½ Macquarie Group Limited ½ 1 Shelley St, Sydney, NSW, 2000 T 02 8232 4259½ M 0448 887 627 ½ marcus.chan...@macquarie.com The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!