How come nobody has mentioned the rare appearance of "The Neck"?
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 15 August 2011 1:27 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED Complacency will be our downfall, we scraped survival by the skin of our teeth and our manager is happy with the team???...if you honestly believe Johnson alone will make that much difference when the likes of Henry are getting worse then so be it. ________________________________ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 15 August 2011 13:23 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Yes Johnson is the only addition to the team that took 26 points from the second half of the season. On 15 August 2011 08:55, Morris, Lee SGT <lee.mor...@defence.gov.au> wrote: UNCLASSIFIED Credit where credit is due, Fletcher and Ward were excellent, Jarvis caused problems but he seems to have changed direction...the rest were ....as per last year really. When I saw the team, Johnson was the only addition from last year...we all know we need more than that shirley????? IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. ________________________________ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 15 August 2011 08:51 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Sigh. On 15 August 2011 07:57, Morris, Lee SGT <lee.mor...@defence.gov.au> wrote: UNCLASSIFIED OK, we won which is fantastic, it really is....but we weren't really that good. Central midfield and defence will be our downfall. We need at least two quality signings for both to avoid another battle. Just for the rceord...I didn't even think O'hara was that impressive on Saturday, gave the ball away far too often and whats with the fancy stuff?????????? Fletcher looks the business and Doyle falls over too much. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. ________________________________ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Sunday, 14 August 2011 17:05 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Boo! Thick Mick out. Conceded a goal. Still not sorted left back. Henry's rubbish. etc etc On 14 August 2011 13:56, Rog & Reet <rognr...@exemail.com.au> wrote: Didn't we used to win away at Norwich on the first game of the season in days of yore? The last time we won away from home against Blackburn was probably in the 1960 Cup Final. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Sunday, 14 August 2011 1:43 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Now, knowing something about our performances against Blackburn ;) I am surprised that things are so quiet. When was the last time we won away on day one Rog? ________________________________ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Thursday, 11 August 2011 3:34 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED Can't believe how quiet it is, just a couple of days away from the season opener. Maybe a few more people have seen our performances against Blackburn than I had imagined. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
