No the money is on Alan Curbishley at the moment ! Sent from my iPhone
On 13/02/2012, at 10:46 PM, Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote: > does anyone think we'd have a chance of enticing Gus Poyet away from Brighton? > > > On 13/02/2012, at 10:43 PM, Paul Hart wrote: > >> Make em put a shift in !!!! >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 10:40 PM, Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote: >> >>> In reality though I don't think we're going to attract the type of manager >>> who wants to play "attractive" football. There simply aren't the type of >>> players in our squad to play that style. We need a manager who can >>> motivate grafters. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 10:37 PM, Marcus Chantry wrote: >>> >>>> Has Dave Jones got himself another job yet? >>>> >>>> There's a Manager called Mark McGhee who gets good wraps at Bristol Rovers. >>>> >>>> >>>> On 13/02/2012, at 10:24 PM, Paul Hart wrote: >>>> >>>>> Sorry meant to say Graham turner >>>>> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>> >>>>> On 13/02/2012, at 10:16 PM, Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Stuart Pearce? christ almighty, Bring back Mick!! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 13/02/2012, at 10:14 PM, Paul Hart wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Stuart Pearce >>>>>>> Alan curbishley >>>>>>> Grahame souness >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 13/02/2012, at 10:11 PM, Steven Millward <millward....@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'd like to see if any of you are brave enough to put three realistic >>>>>>>> names down as replacements >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 13/02/2012, at 10:07 PM, Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> He's GONE!!!!! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 13/02/2012, at 22:04 , Steven Millward wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Clipboard in charge. Lol >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 13/02/2012, at 7:02 PM, "Jeremy Tonks" <to...@hotkey.net.au> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Another sad watershed in my long Wolves hair shirt experience. I >>>>>>>>>>> watched this morning (and genuinely wished I hadn’t). It is the >>>>>>>>>>> first time I have EVER watched Wolves and wished I hadn’t. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Frankly it was embarrassing. Hennessy was the stand out (and he had >>>>>>>>>>> one clanger). Johnston hopefully got an assist for one goal (he’s >>>>>>>>>>> in my fantasy team L). What is MM trying to do to Fletcher and >>>>>>>>>>> Miljas? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Nothing worked and we were woeful in the first half. Abysmal in the >>>>>>>>>>> first half. I hate to say it but we were actually better in the >>>>>>>>>>> second and got absolutely flogged. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> There is no midfield and our defense is pathetic. I don’t care if >>>>>>>>>>> we had Tevez and Ronaldo up front – they’d catch cold. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I’m not for changing managers – but I soon will be L >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Matthew Leese makes very good sense in his lengthy email. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] >>>>>>>>>>> On Behalf Of Steven Millward >>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 6:51 PM >>>>>>>>>>> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I like watching the games on fast forward. I really don't know how >>>>>>>>>>> anyone can say we lack pace. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I don't think the 'hair shirt' of watching the games in the middle >>>>>>>>>>> of the night has anything to do with it. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Imagine fighting amongst yourselves at a football game. >>>>>>>>>>> Embarassing isn't it? I can't get worked up about it anymore. I >>>>>>>>>>> know that Mick and Morgan said that we would progress but we only >>>>>>>>>>> bought Johnson so it was unrealistic to think we'd improve much. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 13 February 2012 15:08, Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I suppose that's quite easy to say when you don't bother staying up >>>>>>>>>>> to watch the games live. Watching the highlights or in 'fast >>>>>>>>>>> forward' means you don't suffer the same pain or get a full >>>>>>>>>>> appreciation of our ineptitude. There were many thousands of fans >>>>>>>>>>> in the ground yesterday who felt the same level of dissatisfaction, >>>>>>>>>>> to the extent that many were fighting amongst themselves. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> After scraping through last season Mick and Morgan promised that >>>>>>>>>>> there would be no repeat of the great escape and that we would make >>>>>>>>>>> progress this season. They have clearly failed to deliver on that >>>>>>>>>>> promise of progress so people should be entitled to criticize. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> However, at the end of the day if we finish in 17th position, in >>>>>>>>>>> line with our wage bill, then we will have had a small victory in >>>>>>>>>>> survival, even if progress clearly hasn't been delivered on the >>>>>>>>>>> pitch. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 13/02/2012, at 1:59 PM, Steven Millward <millward....@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Dear oh dear, it's a good job this generation wasn't being relied >>>>>>>>>>> upon during the war. We'd have surrendered as soon as Poland was >>>>>>>>>>> invaded. We thrashed them in the same fixture last year and they >>>>>>>>>>> thrashed us this year. So what? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It seems no one has any stomach for being perpetually at the bottom >>>>>>>>>>> of the Premier league or losing to local rivals. You all might as >>>>>>>>>>> well go and support one of the teams at the top of the division. >>>>>>>>>>> Or perhaps the Harlem Globe Trotters. They're having a great run >>>>>>>>>>> at the moment >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 13 February 2012 08:10, Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA >>>>>>>>>>> <jpar...@munichre.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I am now fully committed to the cause of getting Mick out now. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Really don’t give a sh*t who replaces him: couldn’t be any worse. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Think of those poor sods back home who work with WBA fans. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] >>>>>>>>>>> On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT >>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 8:03 AM >>>>>>>>>>> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> UNCLASSIFIED >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> A bit late. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Funny thing is, QPR would have done the same to us with 11 men >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of >>>>>>>>>>> Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the >>>>>>>>>>> Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are >>>>>>>>>>> requested to contact the sender and delete the email. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] >>>>>>>>>>> On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry >>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 01:34 >>>>>>>>>>> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> apparently it's kicking off outside the Steve Bull stand. some >>>>>>>>>>> sort of protest demanding Mick's head. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Should have been 6 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] >>>>>>>>>>> On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry >>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM >>>>>>>>>>> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> sorry, 5 at home. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 >>>>>>>>>>> at home? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from >>>>>>>>>>> defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It >>>>>>>>>>> is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the >>>>>>>>>>> intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is >>>>>>>>>>> prohibited and may be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you >>>>>>>>>>> agree that the Munich Re Group will not be liable for any loss >>>>>>>>>>> resulting from viruses or other defects. Any views in this message >>>>>>>>>>> are those of the individual sender, except where the sender >>>>>>>>>>> expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the >>>>>>>>>>> Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any >>>>>>>>>>> action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents >>>>>>>>>>> of this message. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Boo! Clipboard out! >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Boo! Clipboard out! >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Clipboard out! >> >> >> -- >> Boo! Clipboard out! > > -- > Boo! Clipboard out! -- Boo! Clipboard out!
