i"d like to see someone like Gus Poyet or maybe even Di Canio but can't see either of them being attracted to our squad.
On 13/02/2012, at 10:16 PM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > Stuart Pearce? christ almighty, Bring back Mick!! > > > On 13/02/2012, at 10:14 PM, Paul Hart wrote: > >> Stuart Pearce >> Alan curbishley >> Grahame souness >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 10:11 PM, Steven Millward <millward....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I'd like to see if any of you are brave enough to put three realistic names >>> down as replacements >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 10:07 PM, Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote: >>> >>>> He's GONE!!!!! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 13/02/2012, at 22:04 , Steven Millward wrote: >>>> >>>>> Clipboard in charge. Lol >>>>> >>>>> On 13/02/2012, at 7:02 PM, "Jeremy Tonks" <to...@hotkey.net.au> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Another sad watershed in my long Wolves hair shirt experience. I watched >>>>>> this morning (and genuinely wished I hadn’t). It is the first time I >>>>>> have EVER watched Wolves and wished I hadn’t. >>>>>> >>>>>> Frankly it was embarrassing. Hennessy was the stand out (and he had one >>>>>> clanger). Johnston hopefully got an assist for one goal (he’s in my >>>>>> fantasy team L). What is MM trying to do to Fletcher and Miljas? >>>>>> >>>>>> Nothing worked and we were woeful in the first half. Abysmal in the >>>>>> first half. I hate to say it but we were actually better in the second >>>>>> and got absolutely flogged. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> There is no midfield and our defense is pathetic. I don’t care if we had >>>>>> Tevez and Ronaldo up front – they’d catch cold. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I’m not for changing managers – but I soon will be L >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Matthew Leese makes very good sense in his lengthy email. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On >>>>>> Behalf Of Steven Millward >>>>>> Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 6:51 PM >>>>>> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >>>>>> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I like watching the games on fast forward. I really don't know how >>>>>> anyone can say we lack pace. >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't think the 'hair shirt' of watching the games in the middle of >>>>>> the night has anything to do with it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Imagine fighting amongst yourselves at a football game. Embarassing >>>>>> isn't it? I can't get worked up about it anymore. I know that Mick and >>>>>> Morgan said that we would progress but we only bought Johnson so it was >>>>>> unrealistic to think we'd improve much. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 13 February 2012 15:08, Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I suppose that's quite easy to say when you don't bother staying up to >>>>>> watch the games live. Watching the highlights or in 'fast forward' means >>>>>> you don't suffer the same pain or get a full appreciation of our >>>>>> ineptitude. There were many thousands of fans in the ground yesterday >>>>>> who felt the same level of dissatisfaction, to the extent that many were >>>>>> fighting amongst themselves. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> After scraping through last season Mick and Morgan promised that there >>>>>> would be no repeat of the great escape and that we would make progress >>>>>> this season. They have clearly failed to deliver on that promise of >>>>>> progress so people should be entitled to criticize. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> However, at the end of the day if we finish in 17th position, in line >>>>>> with our wage bill, then we will have had a small victory in survival, >>>>>> even if progress clearly hasn't been delivered on the pitch. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 13/02/2012, at 1:59 PM, Steven Millward <millward....@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Dear oh dear, it's a good job this generation wasn't being relied upon >>>>>> during the war. We'd have surrendered as soon as Poland was invaded. >>>>>> We thrashed them in the same fixture last year and they thrashed us this >>>>>> year. So what? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It seems no one has any stomach for being perpetually at the bottom of >>>>>> the Premier league or losing to local rivals. You all might as well go >>>>>> and support one of the teams at the top of the division. Or perhaps the >>>>>> Harlem Globe Trotters. They're having a great run at the moment >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 13 February 2012 08:10, Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA >>>>>> <jpar...@munichre.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I am now fully committed to the cause of getting Mick out now. >>>>>> >>>>>> Really don’t give a sh*t who replaces him: couldn’t be any worse. >>>>>> >>>>>> Think of those poor sods back home who work with WBA fans. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On >>>>>> Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT >>>>>> Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 8:03 AM >>>>>> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >>>>>> Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> UNCLASSIFIED >>>>>> >>>>>> A bit late. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Funny thing is, QPR would have done the same to us with 11 men >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence >>>>>> and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. >>>>>> If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact >>>>>> the sender and delete the email. >>>>>> >>>>>> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On >>>>>> Behalf Of Marcus Chantry >>>>>> Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 01:34 >>>>>> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >>>>>> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies >>>>>> >>>>>> apparently it's kicking off outside the Steve Bull stand. some sort of >>>>>> protest demanding Mick's head. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Should have been 6 >>>>>> >>>>>> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On >>>>>> Behalf Of Marcus Chantry >>>>>> Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM >>>>>> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >>>>>> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies >>>>>> >>>>>> sorry, 5 at home. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at >>>>>> home? >>>>>> >>>>>> On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence >>>>>> to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is >>>>>> confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended >>>>>> recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and >>>>>> may be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re >>>>>> Group will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other >>>>>> defects. Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, >>>>>> except where the sender expressly and with authority states them to be >>>>>> the views of the Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable >>>>>> for any action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the >>>>>> contents of this message. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Clipboard out!
