UNCLASSIFIED

All the available managers are available because they have failed...its
a funny old game.
 
We've left it too late.


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.


________________________________

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of paul 
Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 07:11
To: Nsw Wolves
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]


Never with Hughes Steve, my first choice was O'Neill. 
Sent via BlackBerry from Telstra
________________________________

From: Steven Millward <millward....@gmail.com> 
Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com 
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:03:10 +1100
To: <nswolves@googlegroups.com>
ReplyTo: nswolves@googlegroups.com 
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Didn't you align yourself with Mark Hughes on a number of occasions? I
hear he's doing rubbish at QPR, albeit with lots of money.


On 14 February 2012 07:10, paul <pcr...@contechengineering.com> wrote:


        Morgan will have someone lined up, just hope it is not
Curbishley. I would take Kevin Keegan until the end of the season! 
        Sent via BlackBerry from Telstra
________________________________

        From: Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> 
        Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com 
        Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:46:29 +1100
        To: <nswolves@googlegroups.com>
        ReplyTo: nswolves@googlegroups.com 
        Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

        does anyone think we'd have a chance of enticing Gus Poyet away
from Brighton? 


        On 13/02/2012, at 10:43 PM, Paul Hart wrote:


                Make em put a shift in !!!!
                
                Sent from my iPhone

                On 13/02/2012, at 10:40 PM, Marcus Chantry
<chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
                
                

                        In reality though I don't think we're going to
attract the type of manager who wants to play "attractive" football.
There simply aren't the type of players in our squad to play that style.
We need a manager who can motivate grafters. 



                        On 13/02/2012, at 10:37 PM, Marcus Chantry
wrote:


                                Has Dave Jones got himself another job
yet? 

                                There's a Manager called Mark McGhee who
gets good wraps at Bristol Rovers.


                                On 13/02/2012, at 10:24 PM, Paul Hart
wrote:


                                Sorry meant to say Graham turner
                                
                                Sent from my iPhone

                                On 13/02/2012, at 10:16 PM, Marcus
Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
                                
                                

                                Stuart Pearce? christ almighty, Bring
back Mick!! 


                                On 13/02/2012, at 10:14 PM, Paul Hart
wrote:


                                Stuart Pearce
                                Alan curbishley
                                Grahame souness
                                
                                Sent from my iPhone

                                On 13/02/2012, at 10:11 PM, Steven
Millward <millward....@gmail.com> wrote:
                                
                                

                                I'd like to see if any of you are brave
enough to put three realistic names down as replacements
                                
                                On 13/02/2012, at 10:07 PM, Marcus
Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
                                
                                

                                He's GONE!!!!! 



                                On 13/02/2012, at 22:04 , Steven
Millward wrote:


                                Clipboard in charge. Lol
                                
                                On 13/02/2012, at 7:02 PM, "Jeremy
Tonks" < <mailto:to...@hotkey.net.au> to...@hotkey.net.au> wrote:
                                
                                

                                Another sad watershed in my long Wolves
hair shirt experience. I watched this morning (and genuinely wished I
hadnt). It is the first time I have EVER watched Wolves and wished I
hadnt.

                                Frankly it was embarrassing. Hennessy
was the stand out (and he had one clanger). Johnston hopefully got an
assist for one goal (hes in my fantasy team L). What is MM trying to do
to Fletcher and Miljas?

                                Nothing worked and we were woeful in the
first half. Abysmal in the first half. I hate to say it but we were
actually better in the second and got absolutely flogged.

                                

                                There is no midfield and our defense is
pathetic. I dont care if we had Tevez and Ronaldo up front theyd catch
cold.

                                

                                Im not for changing managers but I soon
will be L

                                

                                Matthew Leese makes very good sense in
his lengthy email.

                                

                                

                                From: <mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com>
nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
                                Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 6:51 PM
                                To: <mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com>
<mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com> nswolves@googlegroups.com
                                Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

                                

                                I like watching the games on fast
forward. I really don't know how anyone can say we lack pace.
                                
                                I don't think the 'hair shirt' of
watching the games in the middle of the night has anything to do with
it.
                                
                                Imagine fighting amongst yourselves at a
football game. Embarassing isn't it? I can't get worked up about it
anymore. I know that Mick and Morgan said that we would progress but we
only bought Johnson so it was unrealistic to think we'd improve much.
                                
                                
                                

                                On 13 February 2012 15:08, Marcus
Chantry < <mailto:chant...@iinet.net.au>  <mailto:chant...@iinet.net.au>
chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote:

                                I suppose that's quite easy to say when
you don't bother staying up to watch the games live. Watching the
highlights or in 'fast forward' means you don't suffer the same pain or
get a full appreciation of our ineptitude. There were many thousands of
fans in the ground yesterday who felt the same level of dissatisfaction,
to the extent that many were fighting amongst themselves.

                                

                                After scraping through last season Mick
and Morgan promised that there would be no repeat of the great escape
and that we would make progress this season. They have clearly failed to
deliver on that promise of progress so people should be entitled to
criticize.

                                

                                However, at the end of the day if we
finish in 17th position, in line with our wage bill, then we will have
had a small victory in survival, even if progress clearly hasn't been
delivered on the pitch.
                                
                                Sent from my iPhone

                                
                                On 13/02/2012, at 1:59 PM, Steven
Millward < <mailto:millward....@gmail.com>
<mailto:millward....@gmail.com> millward....@gmail.com> wrote:

                                Dear oh dear, it's a good job this
generation wasn't being relied upon during the war. We'd have
surrendered as soon as Poland was invaded. We thrashed them in the same
fixture last year and they thrashed us this year. So what?

                                

                                It seems no one has any stomach for
being perpetually at the bottom of the Premier league or losing to local
rivals. You all might as well go and support one of the teams at the top
of the division. Or perhaps the Harlem Globe Trotters. They're having a
great run at the moment

                                

                                

                                
                                

                                On 13 February 2012 08:10, Parkes Jim -
Sydney-MHA < <mailto:jpar...@munichre.com>
<mailto:jpar...@munichre.com> jpar...@munichre.com> wrote:

                                I am now fully committed to the cause of
getting Mick out now.

                                Really dont give a sh*t who replaces
him: couldnt be any worse.

                                Think of those poor sods back home who
work with WBA fans.

                                

                                

                                
________________________________


                                

                                From: <mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com>
<mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com> nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:
<mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com>  <mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com>
nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
                                Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 8:03 AM
                                To: <mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com>
<mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com> nswolves@googlegroups.com
                                Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

                                

                                UNCLASSIFIED

                                A bit late.

                                

                                Funny thing is, QPR would have done the
same to us with 11 men

                                

                                IMPORTANT: This email remains the
property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction
of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in
error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email.

                                
________________________________


                                From: <mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com>
<mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com> nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:
<mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com>  <mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com>
nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
                                Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 01:34
                                To: <mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com>
<mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com> nswolves@googlegroups.com
                                Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies

                                apparently it's kicking off outside the
Steve Bull stand. some sort of protest demanding Mick's head. 

                                

                                On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus
Chantry wrote:

                                

                                I wish we could see Mick's post match
interview. 

                                

                                On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks
wrote:

                                

                                Should have been 6

                                From: <mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com>
<mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com> nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:
<mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com>  <mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com>
nswolves@googlegroups.com]On Behalf OfMarcus Chantry
                                Sent:Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM
                                To: <mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com>
<mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com> nswolves@googlegroups.com
                                Subject:Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies

                                sorry, 5 at home.

                                On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus
Chantry wrote:

                                
                                
                                

                                so will Mick say that we played well and
were unlucky to concede 4 at home?

                                On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor
wrote:

                                
                                
                                

                                Anyone watching this tripe at the
moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up.
Being shown up badly.

                                --
                                Boo! Thick Mick Out.

                                --
                                Boo! Thick Mick Out.

                                --
                                Boo! Thick Mick Out.

                                

                                --
                                Boo! Thick Mick Out.

                                

                                

                                -- 
                                Boo! Thick Mick Out.

                                

                                -- 
                                Boo! Thick Mick Out.

                                -- 
                                Boo! Thick Mick Out.

                                

________________________________

                                CAUTION: This message is intended only
for the named addressee. It is confidential and may be legally
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. By opening
any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group will not be liable
for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any views in this
message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender
expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the Munich
Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action taken,
or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this message.

                                -- 
                                Boo! Thick Mick Out.

                                

                                -- 
                                Boo! Thick Mick Out.

                                -- 
                                Boo! Thick Mick Out.

                                

                                -- 
                                Boo! Thick Mick Out.


                                -- 
                                Boo! Thick Mick Out.
                                


                                -- 
                                Boo! Thick Mick Out.
                                



                                -- 
                                Boo! Thick Mick Out.
                                


                                -- 
                                Boo! Thick Mick Out.
                                


                                -- 
                                Boo! Thick Mick Out.
                                



                                -- 
                                Boo! Thick Mick Out.
                                


                                -- 
                                Boo! Clipboard out!
                                



                                -- 
                                Boo! Clipboard out!
                                



                        -- 
                        Boo! Clipboard out!
                        


                -- 
                Boo! Clipboard out!
                


        

        -- 
        Boo! Clipboard out!
        

        

        -- 
        Boo! Clipboard out!
        


-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!


-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

Reply via email to