On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Bernhard Kaindl wrote:
>
> Yes, looks like a nice way to go for. I have not followed the ntfsprogs
> lists but I have seen that they are continuing some work there as well,
This year ntfsprogs had 12 changes, only one in libntfs which was a
cleanup. During the same time, ntfs-3g had 160 changes from which 95
were in libntfs-3g.
> so I wonder if it wouln't be good to have those two branches merged
> together.
I would happily merge from libntfs but there isn't anything. The utilities
could be linked with libntfs-3g and packed separately. But no resource to
do and support it at the moment.
> --enable-static does nothing because it already default because you have
>
> AM_ENABLE_STATIC
>
> in configure.ac before AC_PROG_LIBTOOL.
The never-ending magics of autotools :-) Thank you for the explanation.
> Understood. Here it comes (also attached).
Commited, thanks. I disabled running ldconfig if --disable-library is used.
The binary size is about 12% less with gcc 4.1.2:
text data bss dec hex filename
-----------------------------------------------
33822 836 48 34706 8792 /bin/ntfs-3g
173164 1184 8 174356 2a914 /lib/libntfs-3g.so.9
206986 2020 56 209062 sum
-----------------------------------------------
183163 944 48 184155 2cf5b /bin/ntfs-3g
The performance is indeed up by 2-5% (random and sequential file creation,
delete, lookup).
Thanks again!
Szaka
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
ntfs-3g-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ntfs-3g-devel
