Hi Jean-Pierre,

On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Jean-Pierre André wrote:

> I will make a new version available next week,

Waiting for it :)

> do you have any recommendation for using cvs ?

Yes. You were added to the core development team and have sourceforge 
CVS read/write access. 

Welcome in the team! :)

The permission handling CVS branch was created with the name 
PERMISSION_HANDLING_BRANCH. You should be able to get read/write 
access to this branch by doing

  export CVS_RSH=ssh 
  cvs -z3 -d:ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/ntfs-3g co -P -r 
PERMISSION_HANDLING_BRANCH ntfs-3g

Read-only anonymous access should work for anybody else similarly using the 
PERMISSION_HANDLING_BRANCH branch tag and following the instructions on

  http://sourceforge.net/cvs/?group_id=181143

Jean-Pierre, I suggest to subscribe to ntfs-3g-cvs as well, so you will get 
notifications of all CVS commits:

  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ntfs-3g-cvs

Googling for "cvs branch" should point to many good CVS documents.

When you think so, then we can also make tarball alpha/beta/etc releases.

Please don't merge to the MAIN branch from the PERMISSION_HANDLING_BRANCH 
branch yet, only the other way around and make sure that you're 
making the commits to the PERMISSION_HANDLING_BRANCH branch (e.g. 
'cat CVS/Tag' should output TPERMISSION_HANDLING_BRANCH).

> >> 2) getting the next key in an index
> >
> > Which one do you need: the index by hash or Security ID?
> 
> I only need it for index by hash (for checking for hash collisions)
> but this should be done in a generic way, there is no need to
> compare keys, just walk in the tree. This would also be useful to
> return sorted file names in readdir()

Ok. General B+Tree handling could be used for many other things (caching, 
etc) and I planned to do it at some point. So, the time arrived :) I think 
I can start working on it already on this weekend.
 
> > Btw, could you test if the read-only file creation works now?
> 
> Yes, it does.

Superb, thanks! :)

> I also implemented the access() method, the default fuse method was not 
> satisfactory.

Yes, I have seen it on fuse-devel. You have already solved the issue before 
I could have reply to you ;)

Enjoy the CVS access and let me know if there were any issues.

Bye,
        Szaka

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
ntfs-3g-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ntfs-3g-devel

Reply via email to