Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote: > On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Marc Andre Tanner wrote: > >> So when you want a fuse file system with correct permission semantics > > Not "a fuse file system". We were talking about only fusexmp.
Ok i agree, it's just that i am currently trying to build something similar as fusexmp (in fact it's almost identical) but case insensitive. And yes i know that case insensitive file systems are generally considered a bad thing[tm]. > For example ntfs-3g passes all the tests but it doesn't use seteuid/setgid > to achieve this. > > FUSE can be used in several ways, it's very flexible. Unfortunately this > often results incorrect conclucions and generalizations about its > capabilities and performance. One of the aims of the NTFS-3G project is > exactly that that it refutes/adjusts such myths. Yeah point taken, my wording wasn't precise enough. I know that you can do everything on your own. However i just want my fs to be mounted on top of a regular file system and let the underlying fs do all the hard work (after all i am lazy ;). Marc -- Marc Andre Tanner >< http://www.brain-dump.org/ >< GPG key: CF7D56C0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ ntfs-3g-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ntfs-3g-devel
