Hi Markus,
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> Will any pointer variables be changed into array specifications?
I think it was explained what's the problem with it (increased executable
binary size).
However you didn't explain why it should be applied which is highly
important. All applied patches must have a good reason with strong
explanation. Otherwise a change is not worth the risk. "Don't fix what
is not broken".
You did send a link to a long kernel thread which seems to confirm that
it's case dependent which method is preferred.
I'm still open but you need to explain why your solution is better in the
used places.
Regards,
Szaka
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
ntfs-3g-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ntfs-3g-devel
