On Wed, 14 May 2008, Adnan Shaheen wrote:
> No I don't have any problem what so ever reading/writing on that volume, it
> was just the matter of fact that you write $MFT has 27 file records. Nothing
> else. So you mean to say, it does not matter wheather $MFT have 27 file
> records or 64 right.
> Means if I change your code and create a new partition with 64 File Records
> that would not be a problem?
If NTFS remains consistent after your changes then you won't have problem.
Szaka
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Szabolcs Szakacsits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, 12 May 2008, Adnan Shaheen wrote:
> >
> > > Dear all.
> > > According to mkntfs.c in mkntfs_initialize_bitmaps() at LINE#3466.
> > > It states that
> > > "Mft size is 27 (NTFS 3.0+) mft records or one cluster,
> > > whichever is bigger"
> > >
> > > I format a partition on Windows Vista. It give me 64.
> > > Where is the problem?
> >
> > It shouldn't matter.
> >
> > Do you have a problem reading/writing NTFS volumes on Vista which were
> > created by mkntfs? If yes, then what version of mkntfs do you use?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Szaka
>
> --
> Regards:
> Adnan Shaheen.
> +92-321-518-0278
--
NTFS-3G: http://ntfs-3g.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
ntfs-3g-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ntfs-3g-devel
