On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 12:00:08 -0700 (MST), William wrote: > > Personally I like 'real' cross-referencing better than filling in fields in order > > to > > minimize the number of keystrokes in the BIB file. > > I suppose that's a valid sentiment, although it saves many, many > keystrokes when your bib file is full of proceedings and journal articles. > Plus it looks fairly silly to reference the proceedings when you reference > only one or two of the articles in it (the same goes for books, journals, > etc.). Oh well... until I'm willing to write my own package I suppose I > have to play along or go back to LaTeX.
If there are more people that agree with you I might change my mind ... > However, the entry for the proceedings themselves have the wrong number, > they get reset and start over from 1 e.g. > > Do You know of any way around this, or am I just going to have to manually > edit the bbl file? You could always \cite the proceedings manually. If you put the reference in a \setbox command it wont show up in the running text, like so: \setbox0\hbox{\cite[XX]} Wrt to your other questions: could you send me your input file(s) or the exact settings you used? It will be (a lot) easier to re-enact your observations if I do not have to guess and invent stuff myself. -- groeten, Taco _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context