This came up a while back...
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>Fei He wrote:
>
>> 1. \setupcite[number][left=[, right=]] did not work. the citation
>> still shows up in the text like (author, year)
>
>In this case, you also need \setuppublications[refcommand=number],
>to change the default alternative for \cite. Or you could have
>used \cite[number][xxx] in the text instead of the defaulted version.
>
>Are you sure you want 'number' instead of 'num'?
...and now I have a similar problem.
I have this in my setup:
\usemodule[bib]
\setuppublications[sorttype=cite]
\setuppublications[criterium=used]
\setuppublications[numbering=yes]
\setuppublications[refcommand=number]
\setupcite[num][left=[, inbetween=-, right=]]
\setupbibtex[database=myBibTeXfile, sort=no]
I'm using \cite[Cite Key] (e.g. \cite[Bush2005a, Rice2005b] ) for my input file
citations.
In my current headache file, My first citation in my input file has four
individual references.
I would like to see:
blah blah [1â4] blah blah
I'm getting:
blah blah [113, 106, 78, 87]
These numbers generated are the database sequence numbers.
So, obviously I"ve got something wrong in my setup since I want the citations
to start at (1) for the first citation and increment as new papers get called
irrespective of their order in the .bib file.
I guess:
refcommand=number
and/or:
setupcite[num]
are inappropriate and/or something else is missing, but I can't find the magic
combo.
I can't tell whether my "citation lists" are going to be compressed (assuming I
have correctly surmised what "compressed" means), because I don't get any
consecutive runs with the numbering "error". I could fake this to check whether
the compression kicks in, but since I'm here already, maybe some fine
ConTeXpert could comment on whether I'll get the desired e.g.
[2,5-7]
rather than:
[2,5,6,7]
once I get the numbering sorted out ?
wtia,
mark.
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
