>===== Original Message From Vit Zyka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ===== >ishamid wrote: >> Dear gang, >> >> Why does lmr in ConTeXt use the ec instead of the texnansi encoding? I just >> noticed that all of my macros that use, e.g., >> >> \char'25 > >lmr is defined for both ec and texnansi encodings (and even for qx). But >ec is default. Use > \usetypescript[latin-modern][texnansi] > \setupbodyfont[latin-modern]
Ok; it just seems strange that texnansi is not the default, since that's closer to Knuth's original. Maybe its because I (like Knuth) am in America where we don't have accents-) >Ishamid, \char is wrong approach since it is encoding-dependent >definition. Use glyph name instead, like \endash, \Aacute. Are those names defined in Plain TeX? But that's a good idea anyway; I'll just depend on the ConTeXt framework. >But ... your glyph number 25 is not defined in the texnansi. So what it is? TeXBook, page 427, character '025 (in ec, \char'10 or \textbreve) Best and Thnx! Idris ============================ Professor Idris Samawi Hamid Department of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
