Idris Samawi Hamid said this at Fri, 22 Apr 2005 08:36:02 -0600:
In any case whatever high-level framework we come up with should largely be determined by your decision on the low/mid-level framework.
See, I beg to differ.
I agree with virtually everything u said, but _maybe_ u missed my point:-))
If Hans either implements
a) >2-char swutch support; or b) \sizea(b)(c) etc,
it affects whether the high-level framework will need to use capital
2-char switches or have the option of using unrestricted lower-case switches
in whatever framework we agree on. Your point is on the framework being _mentioned_,
mine was on the language _used_ to mention the framework (perhaps I should have made
that clearer). The logic of the framework used should be largely independent,
but the language we use to mention it partly depends on the internal implementation.
I look forward to our final consensus!
Best Idris -- Professor Idris Samawi Hamid Department of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
