On 11/15/2021 7:06 PM, Rik Kabel via ntg-context wrote:
On your empty performance test, I get around 0.10, .11, .08 for direct,
and 0.4 for fast. With the grouped styling, those balloon to 0.50, 0.56,
0.48, and 0.44.
just for the record, here with lmtx i get (on a 2013 laptop):
0.128 0.130 0.114 0.057
0.686 0.674 0.660 0.602
while mkiv does:
0.211 0.224 0.131 0.055
0.763 0.767 0.677 0.597
(normally one will use at least a million tests because th elast digot
is kind of meaningless; also the used compiler matters)
but i bet that on an average job our machines don't perform too
different (simple tests like these are happily using the cpu cache)
it's not that easy to make tex jobs run faster but also not that hard to
make them run slower, which i try to avoid -)
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
