On Fri, 6 May 2022, Denis Maier via ntg-context wrote:
> Hi, > thanks for your assessment. Indeed, that looks very promising. > > I've now had a chance to look at this a bit more too. Not that I understand > that stuff in detail, but anyway... > > I also have the impression that extending citeproc-formats.lua should be the > easiest part. As an aside, I think the HTML is in there because that is > needed for the test suite, but for ConTeXt we should be able to copy the > LaTeX mapping and tweak a few things here and there. > > The LaTeX package is hard to understand, at least if you're not used to the > "new" latex3 programming syntax and style. I also can only guess what that > stuff does. But as you say this is rather isolated from the citeproc > processing, so I guess the main task would be to come up with an equivalent > ConTeXt module that writes the citations to the tuc file, calls the citeproc > engine, and uses the results for the output. Right? (I.e., AFAICS, everything > that lives under https://github.com/zepinglee/citeproc-lua/tree/main/citeproc > should pretty much just work, while > https://github.com/zepinglee/citeproc-lua/tree/main/latex must be adapted.) Does citeproc-lua/biblatex support using CSL files (https://citationstyles.org/). IMO, that is currently the biggest limitation of the context bib module that only a few citation styles are supported. Developing a new citation style is relatively easy but a lot of work. Being able to use CSL will simplify things (from the point of view of the user) a lot. Aditya ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
