On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 at 08:30, juh via ntg-context <ntg-context@ntg.nl> wrote:
> > For my own writing I was using Markdown --> Pandoc --> ConTeXt for quite > a while and was happy with it, too. Recently I switched to Org-Mode as I > started to use org-roam to organize my Zettelkasten and want to make use > of the org-mode TODO workflow states to organize the writing process. I > use org-pandoc to export from org-mode/emacs to context. I can also use > ox-context but I have difficulties to customize it to my needs. > > The main problem is that both org-pandoc and ox-context are developed by > very few people. My lisp knowledge is very limited so I have to stick > with what is there. > > Having a solid pipe from the first ideas to the print pdf would be nice. > For now I would say that the exports from org-mode are the weak element > in the chain. But if they fail I can export to Markdown and do the last > steps via Markdown --> Pandoc. > > That said I have to confess that I do more sophisticated layout things > like flyers in pure ConTeXt as it is much faster. > It would be very nice to have a paper / wiki / whatever ... about your workflow Markdown --> Pandoc --> ConTeXt using Org-Mode. In these cases, having "a working workflow" to start with is much better than nothing. -- luigi
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : https://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
